What happens to a homebuyer if the builder is terminated by the authority under whom the project is. A similar case popped up, when a homebuyer approached MahaRERA for help, and found out that the builder was terminated by SRA.

By Varun Singh

In an interesting case, a homebuyer recently approached MahaRERA, seeking relief.

The relief was sought by homebuyer Shilpa More against builder Ashok Gupta

The homebuyer claimed that builder should refund her money with interest and compensation for failing to execute agreement and handing over the possession of the flat that she had booked.

More via a reservation letter had booked an apartment in the builder’s Ganeshwadi CHS-SRA, at Ghatkopar, she even had paid some money tot he builder.

Also Read: Builder cancels booking, MahaRERA orders refund

The builder meanwhile, informed MahaERA that the SRA has terminated him as the promoter of the project. He also claimed to have filed an appeal against the termination.

Gautam Chaterjee, Chairman, MahaRERA in his order noted, that the right of complainant as allottee in the project shall continue to be protected even after change of promoters.

Chaterjee aslo restrained the builder from creating any new allottee in the project till further orders.

He even advised the complainant homebuyer to become an intervener in the current pending litigation before SRA, or any other forum or Court.

The homebuyer’s right in the project was protected under section 15 of RER Act. This section talks about obligation of builder in case of transfer of a real estate project to a third party.

Also Read: Action Against 20 Projects By MahaRERA In A Day.

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Developer Faces Property Attachment for Ignoring MahaRERA Payment Order

In a major win for homebuyers, the Mumbai Collector has issued a notice to attach and auction the properties of Desai Residency Pvt. Ltd. for ignoring a MahaRERA compensation order. Under Section 267 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, authorities can seize movable and immovable assets to recover over ₹42 lakh in dues.

NCLAT Ruling: Claims Arising Post-CIRP Cannot Be Entertained by Resolution Professionals

NCLAT has established that any claims emerging after the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) cannot be accepted by Resolution Professionals. The ruling came in the case of Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. Mr. Udayraj Patwardhan, addressing the legality of a terminated Power Purchase Agreement during the insolvency process. The tribunal emphasized that claims must be filed in accordance with the CIRP commencement date, reinforcing the framework of insolvency law.

For the First Time India Achieved Top 10 Global Rank for Real Estate Transparency

India has made history by entering the top 10 in JLL’s Global Real Estate Transparency Index (GRETI) 2024. This achievement reflects the country’s progress in financial regulation, climate risk disclosure, and streamlined building regulations. Despite notable improvements, India faces challenges in dispute resolution and data access.

Gandhi had an office in 1902 in this Mumbai Building

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, had a office in this Mumbai building near the…