Up next
Tags

Jubilee Hills is known as the Beverly Hills of South India, where many known faces have their home.

Recently a Politician’s son bought a property worth Rs 37 crore in the Southern town of Jubilee Hills.

According to Zapkey.com, the deal is about a residential house, located in Jubille Hills, the land area is 1236 sq yarda, the built up are is 5,930 sq ft.

The seller is Balamreddy Ajantha Reddy, while the buyer is Galla Siddharth, who is the son of Galla Jayadev an Indian Politician and an Industrialist.

Also Read: For Rs 2.14 Crore a month Property goes on lease in Hyd

SHARE ON
TwitterWhatsappFacebookBufferLinkedInPin It
You May Also Like
MICL singed redevelopment of 10 housing societies in Ghatkopar

Rs 264 Crore Worth Redevelopment Signed in Ghatkopar

10 housing Societies in Ghatkopar have signed a redevelopment agreement, in Ghatkopar…
Truliv, India’s most capital-efficient co-living startup, secures strategic investment from BCCL at ₹356.50 Cr valuation to expand into new cities and alternate hospitality asset classes like holiday homes and retirement living.

Truliv Raises Strategic Investment from BCCL at ₹356.50 Cr Valuation; Eyes ₹200 Cr Annual Revenue Through Alternate Hospitality Expansion

In a landmark development for India’s alternate real estate sector, Chennai-based co-living…
PMC Bank Scam accuse HDIL's Rakesh Wadhawan gifted Bandra Bungalow in 2018 to trust

HDIL’s Wadhawan had gifted Bandra bungalow to trust in 2018

PMC Bank scam accuse, HDIL’s Rakesh Wadhawan had gifted the Wadahawan House…
The Rais booked a flat in 2013, paid ₹79 lakh, and were promised possession by December 2017. What followed was a developer collapse, a project takeover, a majority consent exercise they never agreed to — and a regulator that told them to cooperate. The tribunal disagreed.

MahaRERA Told Homebuyers to Cooperate. Tribunal Tells Builder to Pay Up

The Rais booked a flat in 2013, paid ₹79 lakh, and were promised possession by December 2017. What followed was a developer collapse, a project takeover, a majority consent exercise they never agreed to — and a regulator that told them to cooperate. The tribunal disagreed.