Up next
Tags

Cricketer Rohit Sharma has recently put his Bandra House on rent.

According to documents accessed by SquareFeatIndia, provided by Zapkey, the deal was signed on January 4.

The rental deal is for 36 months, the deposit amount is Rs 9.3 lakh.

The monhtly rent for the first year is Rs 3.1 lac, for the second year it is Rs 3.25 lakh per month and for the third year the is Rs 3.41 lakh per month.

While the owner is Rohit Sharma who also is the Captain of Indian Cricket Team the tenant is Shiva Malani.

The property is located on 14th floor of Karma CHSL, 15th road, Bandra West.

The total area of the apartment is 1047 sq ft.

Also Read: Rohit Sharma Sells Villa for Less than He Bought it for

SHARE ON
TwitterWhatsappFacebookBufferLinkedInPin It
You May Also Like
MahaRERA Order

MahaRERA and Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) collaborate to identify erring developers

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has collaborated with the Advertising…
Industrial and Warehousing real estate industry

Strong demand drives industrial and warehousing leasing by 9% YoY

During Jan-September 2022, industrial & warehousing demand witnessed a 9% rise on…
data centre

South India’s Data Centre Market to Witness 65% Capacity Growth by 2030

South India’s data centre market is on an impressive growth trajectory, with…
In a major boost for homebuyers, the Supreme Court has ruled that merely leasing or renting out a purchased residential flat does not disqualify buyers from filing consumer complaints against builders for delays or unfair practices. The verdict in Vinit Bahri vs MGF Developers restores a dismissed case and clarifies that builders must prove "commercial purpose" to exclude consumer status.

Supreme Court Shocker: Landowners Off the Hook for Builder Delays – Homebuyers Must Chase Developers Alone in JDA Deals!

The Supreme Court has ruled that in JDA projects, landowners aren’t jointly liable for construction delays—developers bear sole responsibility for handover and compensation. After a twisted review process involving a remand, the verdict offers huge relief to landowners and housing societies, clarifying buyers’ recourse lies with builders.