Browsing Tag

AY 2020-21

2 posts
ITAT rules that mere mention of buyer’s name in builder’s seized Excel sheet is not enough to prove on-money payment and sustain addition. Addition of ₹25 lakh deleted.

Buyer’s Name in Builder’s Sheet Not Enough to Prove Cash Payment

ITAT rules that mere mention of buyer’s name in builder’s seized Excel sheet is not enough to prove on-money payment and sustain addition. Addition of ₹25 lakh deleted.
In a landmark order, the Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court has upheld the removal of 50 defunct members from Irla CHS records, ruling that membership automatically ceases upon transfer of interest during redevelopment.

Can A Residential Flat Used As Clinic Claim Capital Gains Exemption, Meant for Commercial Property?

ITAT holds that using a residential flat as a clinic does not make it eligible for Section 54F exemption, but directs fresh consideration under Section 54.