<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>D.N. Nagar Shivneri CHS Archives - Square Feat India</title>
	<atom:link href="https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/d-n-nagar-shivneri-chs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/d-n-nagar-shivneri-chs/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Not Just Developers! Tribunal Says Society is Also a Promoter Under RERA</title>
		<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/not-just-developers-tribunal-says-society-is-also-a-promoter-under-rera/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareFeatIndia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 06:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.N. Nagar Shivneri CHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flat Buyers Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MahaRERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Promoter Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA Section 43(5)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunal Orders]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://squarefeatindia.com/?p=9281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a major ruling, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal held that a society redeveloping its own property after terminating the builder is also a “promoter” under RERA — making it liable to compensate flat buyers and requiring it to deposit funds before appealing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/not-just-developers-tribunal-says-society-is-also-a-promoter-under-rera/">Not Just Developers! Tribunal Says Society is Also a Promoter Under RERA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Redevelopment Case Brings Landmark Interpretation of Promoter Liability</strong></p>



<p>In a significant decision that could have far-reaching implications for redevelopment projects across Maharashtra, the <strong>Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MREAT)</strong> has ruled that a <strong>housing society</strong> taking over its own redevelopment after terminating a developer <strong>is to be treated as a “promoter” under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA)</strong>.</p>



<p>The ruling was delivered in a batch of appeals filed by <strong>D.N. Nagar Shivneri Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.</strong>, which challenged a common order of the <strong>MahaRERA Authority</strong> that had directed the society to compensate flat buyers for delays in possession — a liability typically imposed on developers.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2696.png" alt="⚖" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Background: Society vs. Flat Buyers</h3>



<p>The society had originally entered into a <strong>redevelopment agreement in 2010</strong> with a private developer, M/s Sai Siddhant Developers. However, due to continued delays and contractual breaches by the developer, the society <strong>terminated the development agreement</strong> and opted to complete the project through <strong>self-redevelopment</strong>.</p>



<p>Meanwhile, several <strong>flat buyers (allottees)</strong> who had purchased flats from the original developer approached MahaRERA, claiming delays and seeking refund with interest. The MahaRERA Authority passed a common order in April 2025, <strong>holding the society jointly and severally liable</strong> along with the developer and <strong>directing compensation under Section 18 of RERA</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f3db.png" alt="🏛" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Tribunal: Society Must Follow RERA Rules</h3>



<p>Challenging this, the society filed appeals and sought <strong>exemption from the mandatory pre-deposit</strong> under <strong>Section 43(5) of the RERA Act</strong>, arguing that it is not a “promoter” under the law, and hence the pre-deposit requirement should not apply.</p>



<p>However, in a detailed judgment, the Tribunal <strong>rejected this plea</strong> and clearly held:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><strong>“We come to the conclusion that <em>prima facie</em> the appellant society falls within the definition of promoter under the provisions of RERA Act, 2016…”</strong></p>
</blockquote>



<p>The Tribunal further stated that since the society had taken over the project and continued construction, and was even shown as a <strong>“landowner/promoter”</strong> on MahaRERA records, it could not disown the obligations that came with that role — especially those towards allottees.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4b8.png" alt="💸" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Pre-Deposit Required</h3>



<p>As per the RERA Act, a promoter who appeals a MahaRERA order must <strong>first deposit at least 30% of the penalty or compensation amount</strong>. The Tribunal ruled that the <strong>society must make this pre-deposit before the appeals can be entertained on merits</strong>.</p>



<p>This is a setback for the society, which claimed it had no contractual relationship with the flat buyers and that it had not received any money from them.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f9fe.png" alt="🧾" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Legal Significance</h3>



<p>This decision draws a clear line: <strong>if a society steps into the shoes of a defaulting developer and continues the project</strong>, it cannot escape the regulatory responsibilities and consumer liabilities under RERA. It sets a precedent that could impact hundreds of self-redevelopment and society-led projects across the state.</p>



<p>The Tribunal relied on the fact that the society:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Took over possession of the project and continued construction,</li>



<li>Is named as a landowner/promoter in MahaRERA registration,</li>



<li>Benefited from approvals and plan modifications post termination of the developer.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f5e3.png" alt="🗣" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> What It Means for Homebuyers and Societies</h3>



<p>For <strong>homebuyers</strong>, the judgment is a relief. It means that they can seek redress and compensation <strong>even when the original builder is out of the picture</strong>.</p>



<p>For <strong>housing societies</strong>, it sends a strong message: if you take over redevelopment, <strong>you take over the legal liabilities too</strong> — including timely delivery, compensation for delay, and registration duties.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f9ed.png" alt="🧭" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> What’s Next?</h3>



<p>The society now has four weeks to <strong>comply with the pre-deposit condition</strong>. Only after that will the Tribunal hear the actual appeals on the merits of the case — including whether the society is ultimately liable for delay compensation.</p>



<p>This decision may trigger more cautious and legally informed decisions among societies embarking on self-redevelopment.</p>



<p>Also Read: <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-appellate-tribunal-rejects-developers-appeal-over-delay-in-filing/">MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal Rejects Developer’s Appeal Over Delay in Filing</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/not-just-developers-tribunal-says-society-is-also-a-promoter-under-rera/">Not Just Developers! Tribunal Says Society is Also a Promoter Under RERA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
