Browsing Tag

Delayed possession

44 posts
In a major victory for homebuyers, MahaREAT has overturned MahaRERA's order in the Cavansite project case, ruling that the possession date in a registered agreement is sacrosanct and cannot be changed by any authority without mutual consent.

Builder Skips RERA Hearings, Homebuyers Win Ex-Parte Refund Order

Despite repeated notices and opportunities, the promoter neither appeared nor filed any reply, forcing MahaRERA to pass an ex-parte order granting relief to the homebuyers.
In a 21-year-long battle, the Maharashtra Co-operative Appellate Court has ordered full vacant possession of Flat No. 702 in Suyog Darshan Society, Versova to Mohan Kubal, directing auction of remaining articles and appointing a new Court Receiver.

Mumbai Homebuyers Wait 16 Years for Flats, Finally Gets Relief

Family paid ₹4.22 crore in 2010 for Godrej project flats. MahaRERA rejects Godrej’s objections, orders Agreement for Sale execution and delay interest after 16 years.
A Mumbai housewife received a shocking ₹55 lakh tax demand on a flat she never paid for. Her only fault? Her name was on the agreement. What happened next will relieve many Indian families...

No Date, No Justice: MahaRERA Rejects Homebuyer’s Delay Claim Over Vague 2011 AFS

In a controversial order, MahaRERA has rejected a homebuyer’s claim for interest on delayed possession solely because his 2011 Agreement for Sale did not mention any specific date. The Authority dismissed the complaint filed by Imran Haedr against K.K. Constructions but directed a refund as per contract terms. The ruling highlights the risks of signing agreements with vague possession clauses even in the RERA era.
In a major relief to homebuyers, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has directed Parorch Developers to refund over ₹2.25 crore with interest, holding that an allotment letter is a valid enforceable contract under RERA even in the absence of a registered Agreement for Sale. The Tribunal overturned MahaRERA’s dismissal order in the Trinity Towers, Powai case.

MahaRERA Orders Interest for Delayed Possession in Kalyan’s Vrundavan Project

MahaRERA directs Shree Vasturachana Developers to pay interest for delayed possession in Vrundavan project, Kalyan, as physical handover without OC ruled invalid. Buyer wins compensation under Section 18.
The Rais booked a flat in 2013, paid ₹79 lakh, and were promised possession by December 2017. What followed was a developer collapse, a project takeover, a majority consent exercise they never agreed to — and a regulator that told them to cooperate. The tribunal disagreed.

MahaRERA Told Homebuyers to Cooperate. Tribunal Tells Builder to Pay Up

The Rais booked a flat in 2013, paid ₹79 lakh, and were promised possession by December 2017. What followed was a developer collapse, a project takeover, a majority consent exercise they never agreed to — and a regulator that told them to cooperate. The tribunal disagreed.