Browsing Tag

maharera order

19 posts
In a major relief for homebuyers, MREAT has held that allottees can challenge only the unfavourable portions of a RERA order while simultaneously initiating recovery proceedings against the promoter. The Tribunal rejected the builder’s stay plea and imposed costs.

MahaRERA Cracks the Whip on Bhagwati Developers: Kharghar Homebuyers Get 6-Month Amenities Deadline & 1-Month Permanent Parking Relief at Bhagwati Greens 2

MahaRERA has cracked down on Bhagwati Developers, giving Kharghar homebuyers a major relief: complete all promised amenities including swimming pool, gym and play areas in 6 months, and hand over permanent parking spaces within just 1 month at Bhagwati Greens 2
MahaRERA orders new developer to hand over flat and pay interest despite claiming it never received payment, holding both builders jointly liable in Mumbai Evergreen Woods case.

New Builder Said “We Didn’t Take Your Money.” Buyer Still Won: MahaRERA Orders Possession, Interest in Mumbai Project Dispute

MahaRERA orders new developer to hand over flat and pay interest despite claiming it never received payment, holding both builders jointly liable in Mumbai Evergreen Woods case.
The Rais booked a flat in 2013, paid ₹79 lakh, and were promised possession by December 2017. What followed was a developer collapse, a project takeover, a majority consent exercise they never agreed to — and a regulator that told them to cooperate. The tribunal disagreed.

Architect’s Certificate Cannot Replace Occupation Certificate, Rules Authority

MahaRERA has ruled that uploading Form 4 does not amount to project completion without an Occupation Certificate, ordering refunds with interest to homebuyers after prolonged delay.
In a ruling that clarifies the scope of RERA protections, MahaRERA has held that an initial investment later converted into a registered flat purchase creates a valid allottee-promoter relationship, entitling the complainant to withdraw from a delayed project and claim full refund with interest, irrespective of COVID-related extensions.

MahaRERA Rejects Builder’s Plea to Sell Flat Before Refunding Buyer

MahaRERA has ruled that builders cannot make refunds conditional upon resale of flats. In the Viva Vishnupuram case, the Authority ordered a full refund with interest after finding a decade-long delay in handing over possession, reinforcing the unconditional rights of homebuyers under Section 18 of RERA.
In a ruling that clarifies the scope of RERA protections, MahaRERA has held that an initial investment later converted into a registered flat purchase creates a valid allottee-promoter relationship, entitling the complainant to withdraw from a delayed project and claim full refund with interest, irrespective of COVID-related extensions.

MahaRERA Orders Interest for Delay in Gulraj Trinity Project, Allows 15 Homebuyer Complaints

MahaRERA has ordered Reliable Builders & Developers to pay interest for delayed possession to 15 homebuyers in the Gulraj Trinity project, holding that contractual possession dates cannot be overridden by unilateral extensions.