No Date, No Justice: MahaRERA Rejects Homebuyer’s Delay Claim Over Vague 2011 AFS

In a controversial order, MahaRERA has rejected a homebuyer’s claim for interest on delayed possession solely because his 2011 Agreement for Sale did not mention any specific date. The Authority dismissed the complaint filed by Imran Haedr against K.K. Constructions but directed a refund as per contract terms. The ruling highlights the risks of signing agreements with vague possession clauses even in the RERA era.

Homebuyers Beware? MahaRERA Rules New Developer Not Liable for Old Promoter’s Defaults

In a significant ruling, MahaRERA has allowed fresh registration for Parinee Eminence Phase 1 under a new promoter while clarifying that previous homebuyers cannot enforce their agreements against the incoming developer. Old claims remain against the terminated promoter, with a lien created for protection.

RERA Not for Redevelopment: Tribunal Warns Housing Society Members

Important alert for housing societies: Original members getting rehab flats in redevelopment projects cannot file complaints against the builder under RERA, rules Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal. Disputes must be resolved through the Development Agreement and society only.

Approvals & Clearances Builder’s Duty, Home Buyers Can’t Suffer Delays

“Getting approvals, sanctions, environmental clearance, etc., is the builder’s responsibility. Buyers cannot be made to suffer for these delays,” ruled MahaRERA while directing full refund with interest to homebuyers in the Vardhaman Park project.

Builder Pockets 90% of Your Money,Then Cancels Your Flat — Tribunal Says: Not on Our Watch

A Mira Road builder collected over ₹28 lakh from a homebuyer across four years, never once executed an Agreement for Sale, then cancelled his flat for “non-payment.” The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal wasn’t buying it — and delivered one of the most comprehensive homebuyer-friendly rulings in recent memory.