Browsing Tag

MahaRERA

407 posts
In a significant ruling, MahaRERA has allowed fresh registration for Parinee Eminence Phase 1 under a new promoter while clarifying that previous homebuyers cannot enforce their agreements against the incoming developer. Old claims remain against the terminated promoter, with a lien created for protection.

Homebuyers Beware? MahaRERA Rules New Developer Not Liable for Old Promoter’s Defaults

In a significant ruling, MahaRERA has allowed fresh registration for Parinee Eminence Phase 1 under a new promoter while clarifying that previous homebuyers cannot enforce their agreements against the incoming developer. Old claims remain against the terminated promoter, with a lien created for protection.
MahaRERA has ruled that a booking application form does not by itself create a binding sale contract and directed Mahindra Happinest Developers to refund ₹1.50 lakh to a homebuyer, holding that forfeiture was illegal as the booking was never completed.

RERA Not for Redevelopment: Tribunal Warns Housing Society Members

Important alert for housing societies: Original members getting rehab flats in redevelopment projects cannot file complaints against the builder under RERA, rules Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal. Disputes must be resolved through the Development Agreement and society only.
“Getting approvals, sanctions, environmental clearance, etc., is the builder’s responsibility. Buyers cannot be made to suffer for these delays,” ruled MahaRERA while directing full refund with interest to homebuyers in the Vardhaman Park project.

Approvals & Clearances Builder’s Duty, Home Buyers Can’t Suffer Delays

“Getting approvals, sanctions, environmental clearance, etc., is the builder’s responsibility. Buyers cannot be made to suffer for these delays,” ruled MahaRERA while directing full refund with interest to homebuyers in the Vardhaman Park project.
A Mira Road builder collected over ₹28 lakh from a homebuyer across four years, never once executed an Agreement for Sale, then cancelled his flat for "non-payment." The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal wasn't buying it — and delivered one of the most comprehensive homebuyer-friendly rulings in recent memory.

Builder Pockets 90% of Your Money,Then Cancels Your Flat — Tribunal Says: Not on Our Watch

A Mira Road builder collected over ₹28 lakh from a homebuyer across four years, never once executed an Agreement for Sale, then cancelled his flat for “non-payment.” The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal wasn’t buying it — and delivered one of the most comprehensive homebuyer-friendly rulings in recent memory.
MahaRERA has dismissed a high-value complaint by steel supplier Nikant Steel against Sheth Developers, ruling that the dispute over three flats in the delayed Sheth Blue Ivy project does not qualify as a standard RERA promoter-allottee matter due to documentation discrepancies and its origin in a commercial debt.

MahaRERA Orders Interest for Delayed Possession in Kalyan’s Vrundavan Project

MahaRERA directs Shree Vasturachana Developers to pay interest for delayed possession in Vrundavan project, Kalyan, as physical handover without OC ruled invalid. Buyer wins compensation under Section 18.