Browsing Tag

Manoj Saunik

6 posts
MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.

MahaRERA Upholds Builder’s Termination of 7 Office Units Over Payment Default

MahaRERA has upheld the termination of seven office unit agreements by Raveshia Realtors in The Metropole project, ruling that the allottees failed to pay as per the registered agreements.
MahaRERA has dismissed six review pleas by CCI Projects, holding that maternity leave of an employee is not sufficient cause for filing beyond the mandatory 45-day period.

MahaRERA: Employee’s Maternity Leave Can’t Justify 136-Day Delay by Builder

MahaRERA has dismissed six review pleas by CCI Projects, holding that maternity leave of an employee is not sufficient cause for filing beyond the mandatory 45-day period.
MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.

Unhappy With a MahaRERA Order? Avoid These Costly Mistakes or Your Review May Be Rejected

MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.
In a major relief to homebuyers, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has directed Parorch Developers to refund over ₹2.25 crore with interest, holding that an allotment letter is a valid enforceable contract under RERA even in the absence of a registered Agreement for Sale. The Tribunal overturned MahaRERA’s dismissal order in the Trinity Towers, Powai case.

MahaRERA Dismisses Steel Supplier’s ₹6 Cr Refund Claim Against Mumbai Project

MahaRERA has dismissed a high-value complaint by steel supplier Nikant Steel against Sheth Developers, ruling that the dispute over three flats in the delayed Sheth Blue Ivy project does not qualify as a standard RERA promoter-allottee matter due to documentation discrepancies and its origin in a commercial debt.
A Mumbai housewife received a shocking ₹55 lakh tax demand on a flat she never paid for. Her only fault? Her name was on the agreement. What happened next will relieve many Indian families...

No Date, No Justice: MahaRERA Rejects Homebuyer’s Delay Claim Over Vague 2011 AFS

In a controversial order, MahaRERA has rejected a homebuyer’s claim for interest on delayed possession solely because his 2011 Agreement for Sale did not mention any specific date. The Authority dismissed the complaint filed by Imran Haedr against K.K. Constructions but directed a refund as per contract terms. The ruling highlights the risks of signing agreements with vague possession clauses even in the RERA era.