Browsing Tag

Occupation Certificate

12 posts
MahaRERA holds pure SRA rehab claims outside its jurisdiction after rejecting complaint against Shreedham Constructions.

MahaRERA Rules Signed Agreement Overrides Ad Claims in Carpet Area Dispute

MahaRERA ruled that a signed Agreement for Sale prevails over builder advertisements in a carpet area dispute.
MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.

Builder Sells Flat, Later Says It Belongs to MHADA, Asks Homebuyer to Take Refund and Leave the Flat

MahaRERA rejected builder’s attempt to cancel a 2014 flat deal after claiming the unit was MHADA-reserved, and ordered possession.
A Mumbai housewife received a shocking ₹55 lakh tax demand on a flat she never paid for. Her only fault? Her name was on the agreement. What happened next will relieve many Indian families...

Builder Hands Flat To Third Party, While Homebuyer Was Busy Fighting MahaRERA Case

While a homebuyer battled in MahaRERA for his flat, the builder handed it over to someone else. The Authority has now ordered possession with OC and heavy interest from 2018.
MahaRERA Order

MahaRERA Rejects Joint Complaints by Homebuyers Seeking Individual Reliefs

MahaRERA has partly allowed a complaint by 11 flat buyers in the Gaurav Samruddhi project but rejected most individual reliefs, citing the procedural bar on joint complaints for personal grievances and directing buyers to file separate complaints or approach through their registered society for collective issues. The Authority ordered the developer to obtain the Occupation Certificate within 30 days.
MahaRERA

MahaRERA Orders Kolte-Patil Developers to Pay Interest for Delayed Possession in Vile Parle Redevelopment Project

MahaRERA has partly allowed a complaint by Manohar Shetty and Lalita M. Shetty against Kolte-Patil Developers, ordering payment of interest at SBI’s highest MCLR + 2% for the delay in handing over possession of a flat in the Jai Vijay redevelopment project from October 2019 to March 2020. The ruling underscores that contractual possession dates bind promoters despite project extensions or external delays.