<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>property possession delay Archives - Square Feat India</title>
	<atom:link href="https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/property-possession-delay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/property-possession-delay/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>MahaRERA Orders Refund, Possession in Lapsed Bhayandar Project; Promoter Absent from Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-orders-refund-possession-in-lapsed-bhayandar-project-promoter-absent-from-proceedings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareFeatIndia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebuyer rights India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lapsed project Mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MahaRERA April 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maharera order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai real estate disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property possession delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate regulatory authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA refund order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swayam Developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V.M. Heights Bhayandar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://squarefeatindia.com/?p=9332</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a major ruling, MahaRERA has ordered refunds and possession for homebuyers in the lapsed V.M. Heights project in Bhayandar, citing serious non-compliance by the promoter who remained absent throughout the hearings. The Authority directed immediate refund with interest and execution of sale agreements, reinforcing its pro-buyer stance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-orders-refund-possession-in-lapsed-bhayandar-project-promoter-absent-from-proceedings/">MahaRERA Orders Refund, Possession in Lapsed Bhayandar Project; Promoter Absent from Proceedings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has passed a strong order against the promoter of a lapsed Bhayandar-based housing project — <em>V.M. Heights</em> — for failing to hand over possession, execute sale agreements, and refund homebuyers despite repeated delays and violations.</p>



<p>In a final order passed by Chairperson <strong>Manoj Saunik</strong>, MahaRERA has directed <strong>Swayam Developers</strong> and associated respondents to <strong>refund amounts with interest</strong>, <strong>hand over possession</strong> with <strong>Occupancy Certificate (OC)</strong>, and <strong>not create third-party rights</strong> over flats that have been partially paid for.</p>



<p>The project, registered under <strong>P51700013349</strong>, was originally scheduled for completion on <strong>December 31, 2018</strong>, with an extended deadline of <strong>December 30, 2022</strong>. However, the developer failed to obtain the OC and did not apply for further extension, rendering the project <em>lapsed</em> under RERA norms.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f539.png" alt="🔹" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Complaint-Wise Outcomes:</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Dilip Bafna</strong>, who had paid ₹14 lakh for Flat 204, was granted a <strong>refund with interest from January 1, 2019</strong>, as he chose to withdraw from the project. MahaRERA also allowed him to separately approach the Adjudicating Officer for compensation.</li>



<li><strong>Ramesh Maurya</strong>, whose flat was allegedly leased out by the builder without consent, had his complaint dismissed on procedural grounds. His earlier 2018 case regarding delayed possession had already been settled via consent terms.</li>



<li><strong>Natwar Parmar</strong>, who had paid over 60% of the flat’s cost, was granted <strong>possession of Flat No. 101</strong>, along with instructions to the builder to execute the agreement for sale and not create third-party interests.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f539.png" alt="🔹" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Promoter Absent, Regulatory Breaches Noted</h3>



<p>MahaRERA observed that the promoter had <strong>remained absent for three consecutive hearings</strong>, failed to <strong>update project status</strong> on the portal since 2019, and <strong>accepted over 10% payment</strong> from buyers without executing sale agreements — a direct violation of Section 13 of the RERA Act.</p>



<p>The Authority has also <strong>denied the promoter the benefit of the COVID-19-related moratorium period</strong>, citing clear inaction and non-compliance.</p>



<p>The order directs the promoter to:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Refund amounts with applicable interest within <strong>60 days</strong></li>



<li><strong>Apply for project extension</strong> within <strong>30 days</strong></li>



<li>Update project status and submit quarterly progress reports, failing which <strong>penalties under Section 63</strong> will apply</li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f539.png" alt="🔹" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> Legal Significance</h3>



<p>This case reiterates MahaRERA’s approach toward <strong>buyer-centric enforcement</strong>, especially in projects where developers have failed to obtain OC or execute agreements despite receiving substantial payments. It also underscores the risks of non-compliance with mandatory RERA obligations — including promoter absence during proceedings.</p>



<p>Also Read: <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-redefines-criteria-for-sros-to-benefit-developers-outside-mmr/">MahaRERA Redefines Criteria for SROs to Benefit Developers Outside MMR</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-orders-refund-possession-in-lapsed-bhayandar-project-promoter-absent-from-proceedings/">MahaRERA Orders Refund, Possession in Lapsed Bhayandar Project; Promoter Absent from Proceedings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
