Browsing Tag

Redevelopment

53 posts
Court reiterates Section 79A redevelopment guidelines are directory, not mandatory, while upholding society redevelopment.

Redevelopment Guidelines Under Section 79A Not Mandatory, Appellate Court Reiterates

Court reiterates Section 79A redevelopment guidelines are directory, not mandatory, while upholding society redevelopment.
MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.

Paid ₹1.5 Crore, Got No Flat: MahaRERA Rejects Buyer’s Claim Against New Developer

In a setback for homebuyers in redevelopment projects, MahaRERA has dismissed a complaint by a buyer who paid ₹1.5 crore to the original developer. The Authority ruled that the new developer cannot be held liable after the society lawfully terminated the old agreement, leaving the buyer to pursue remedies only against Zaveri Constructions.
BMC will table OC Amnesty Scheme draft in Standing Committee tomorrow

Exclusive: BMC OC Amnesty Scheme; Draft to be Presented in Standing Committee Tomorrow

BMC will table OC Amnesty Scheme draft in Standing Committee tomorrow
Bombay HC largely upholds award in favour of Goregaon Pearl society against developer, confirms termination and ₹7.08 cr claim, but directs refund of additional FSI purchase costs.

Bombay HC Upholds ₹6.53 Cr Trust Deal: Revocation Only on Proof of Fraud

Bombay HC has upheld the ₹6.53 Cr trust property deal in favour of Bagasarwala Property LLP, ruling that revocation under Section 36(2) is permitted only on clear proof of fraud, not for re-examining valuation or merits.
Maharashtra government tightens rules to avoid delays in land acquisition court cases, ensuring faster justice and compensation for affected citizens.

Bombay High Court Orders Probe Against Deputy Registrar Over Political Influence in Coop Society

“In a sharp rebuke to political meddling in cooperative societies, the Bombay High Court has restored the elected managing committee of a Borivali housing society and directed the state to probe the Deputy Registrar for acting under external influence.”