Browsing Tag

RERA complaint

4 posts
MahaRERA has ruled that a booking application form does not by itself create a binding sale contract and directed Mahindra Happinest Developers to refund ₹1.50 lakh to a homebuyer, holding that forfeiture was illegal as the booking was never completed.

MahaRERA While Dismissing Homebuyer’s Complaint: “We Cannot Guess the Possession Date”

A homebuyer’s MahaRERA complaint in the Bhakti Meadows project was dismissed after the Authority found that the Agreement for Sale lacked the possession date, making delay assessment impossible.
In 2025, MahaRERA delivered a series of landmark reforms—disposing of a record 6,945 complaints, integrating all planning authorities, tightening compliance norms, and strengthening enforcement—marking a decisive shift toward faster justice, transparency, and stronger protection for homebuyers across Maharashtra.

Homebuyers’ Lesson from MahaRERA: Group Complaints Can Get Dismissed if Individual Issues Are Clubbed

In a key ruling, MahaRERA dismissed a group complaint by 20 Pune homebuyers against their builder, saying that individual issues like parking or leakage can’t be clubbed together. Here’s what every homebuyer should know before filing a RERA case.
MahaRERA

MahaRERA Dismisses Complaint Against Developer Over Redevelopment Dispute

MahaRERA has dismissed a complaint filed by Manish Rajput against Rajhans Realtors over a delayed redevelopment project, citing lack of jurisdiction. The complainant alleged non-payment of rent, reduction in allotted flat area, and project delays, but MahaRERA ruled that redevelopment projects do not qualify as real estate sales under RERA, directing the matter to civil court.
Depressed homebuyer

MahaRERA Dismisses Homebuyers’ Refund Plea as They Relinquished Property to Lender

MahaRERA has ruled that homebuyers who relinquish their property to a lender lose their right to claim refunds from the developer. In a case involving the Zeal Regency project, two buyers sought a refund after the project was delayed, but MahaRERA dismissed their plea, citing that they had surrendered ownership to the lender, who later auctioned the flat.