<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RERA technical lapse Archives - Square Feat India</title>
	<atom:link href="https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/rera-technical-lapse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/rera-technical-lapse/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 03:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.6</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>One Signature Not on Time Costs Homebuyer His Entire Case in RERA Appeal</title>
		<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/one-signature-not-on-time-costs-homebuyer-his-entire-case-in-rera-appeal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareFeatIndia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 03:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay Condonation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebuyer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanakia Spaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MahaRERA appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate litigation India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA technical lapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsigned appeal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://squarefeatindia.com/?p=11777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A homebuyer lost his RERA appeal without a merits hearing after the MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal held that unsigned and unnotarized appeal documents are invalid, turning an alleged 8-day delay into 125 days.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/one-signature-not-on-time-costs-homebuyer-his-entire-case-in-rera-appeal/">One Signature Not on Time Costs Homebuyer His Entire Case in RERA Appeal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A homebuyer’s attempt to challenge a MahaRERA order failed—not on merits, but on <strong>technical lapses in filing the appeal</strong>. In a sharply reasoned order, the <strong>Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai</strong>, held that <strong>unsigned, unaffirmed, and unnotarized appeal documents cannot constitute a valid appeal</strong>, resulting in the outright dismissal of the homebuyer’s case.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ruling came in <strong>M.A. No. 751 of 2025 (Delay) in Appeal No. AT06/00319/2025</strong>, between allottee <strong>Anubhav Virmani</strong> and promoter <strong>Kanakia Spaces Realty Pvt. Ltd.</strong>, and underscores how procedural mistakes can completely extinguish a homebuyer’s appellate rights under RERA.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Triggered the Homebuyer’s Loss</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The homebuyer sought to appeal against a MahaRERA Authority order dated <strong>30 January 2025</strong>, which had dismissed his complaint as premature.<br>Under Section 44 of the RERA Act, an appeal must be filed within <strong>60 days</strong>, i.e., by <strong>30 March 2025</strong>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The allottee claimed:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Appeal was filed online on <strong>08 April 2025</strong></li>



<li>Delay was only <strong>8 days</strong></li>



<li>Delay occurred due to frequent professional travel</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On this basis, a <strong>delay condonation application</strong> was filed.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Developer’s Advocate Exposes Critical Filing Defects</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The decisive blow to the homebuyer’s case came from <strong>Advocate Vinod Talreja</strong>, appearing for <strong>Kanakia Spaces Realty Pvt. Ltd.</strong>, who highlighted serious procedural defects in the appeal filing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adv. Talreja pointed out that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The appeal memo uploaded on <strong>08.04.2025 was unsigned</strong></li>



<li>It was <strong>neither affirmed nor notarized</strong></li>



<li>No vakalatnama or authorization existed on the claimed filing date</li>



<li>All documents—including affidavits and appeal memo—were <strong>signed, affirmed, and notarized only on 04 August 2025</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Based on these defects, Adv. Talreja argued that:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An unsigned and unexecuted appeal cannot be treated as a valid appeal in law, and such filing does not stop the clock of limitation.</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This argument proved pivotal.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tribunal’s Finding: No Valid Appeal Without Proper Execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Appellate Tribunal, comprising <strong>Justice S.S. Shinde (Chairperson)</strong> and <strong>Shri Shrikant M. Deshpande (Member A)</strong>, accepted the promoter’s submissions and held that:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Unsigned, unaffirmed, and unnotarized documents do not constitute a valid appeal.</strong></p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Relying on <strong>Order XLI Rule 1 of the CPC</strong> and the <strong>MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal Regulations, 2019</strong>, the Tribunal ruled that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Mere online uploading of defective documents is insufficient</li>



<li>An appeal becomes valid <strong>only when duly signed and executed</strong></li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From 8 Days to 125 Days: How the Delay Ballooned</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the basis of Adv. Talreja’s submissions, the Tribunal concluded that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The appeal became legally valid <strong>only on 04 August 2025</strong></li>



<li>Limitation expired on <strong>30 March 2025</strong></li>



<li>Actual delay was <strong>125 days</strong>, not 8 days</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Tribunal found that the homebuyer:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Suppressed material facts</li>



<li>Misrepresented the length of delay</li>



<li>Did not approach the Tribunal with <strong>clean hands</strong></li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Travel Excuse Rejected Despite Homebuyer’s Plea</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The homebuyer, represented by <strong>Advocate Aman Shukla</strong>, argued that frequent travel for professional commitments caused the delay.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the Tribunal rejected this explanation, observing that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>No compelling or documented reasons were shown</li>



<li>No explanation was given for long periods of inactivity while in Mumbai</li>



<li>In the digital era, appeals can be prepared and filed remotely</li>



<li>Routine professional travel cannot override statutory limitation</li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tribunal Warns Against Misuse of Online Filing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In strong words, the Tribunal cautioned that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Allowing defective appeals to be cured months later would create a <strong>dangerous precedent</strong></li>



<li>Parties could manipulate limitation by uploading unsigned documents</li>



<li>Such practices would undermine the <strong>substantive law of limitation</strong></li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final Outcome: Homebuyer’s Appeal Ends Without Merits Hearing</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Delay condonation application rejected</strong></li>



<li><strong>Appeal dismissed as non-maintainable</strong></li>



<li>No examination of the homebuyer’s grievance on merits</li>



<li>Parties directed to bear their own costs</li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why This Order Is a Wake-Up Call for Homebuyers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This case is a stark reminder that:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Technical compliance is as critical as substantive rights</strong></li>



<li>Even genuine grievances can fail due to procedural lapses</li>



<li>RERA’s appellate process is unforgiving of defective filings</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For homebuyers, the message is clear:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>A single technical mistake can cost the entire appeal.</strong></p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Also Read: <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-dismisses-complaint-against-developer-over-redevelopment-dispute/">MahaRERA Dismisses Complaint Against Developer Over Redevelopment Dispute</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/one-signature-not-on-time-costs-homebuyer-his-entire-case-in-rera-appeal/">One Signature Not on Time Costs Homebuyer His Entire Case in RERA Appeal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
