<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Section 13 RERA Archives - Square Feat India</title>
	<atom:link href="https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/section-13-rera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/section-13-rera/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Even Without Agreement for Sale, MahaRERA Can Order Refund to Prevent Injustice</title>
		<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/even-without-agreement-for-sale-maharera-can-order-refund-to-prevent-injustice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareFeatIndia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajmeri Heights Andheri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebuyer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MahaRERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai real estate cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA refund order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 13 RERA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://squarefeatindia.com/?p=11664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MahaRERA held that even without an Agreement for Sale, it can order refund with interest, as seen in the Ajmeri Heights Andheri case involving Ajmeri Realty.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/even-without-agreement-for-sale-maharera-can-order-refund-to-prevent-injustice/">Even Without Agreement for Sale, MahaRERA Can Order Refund to Prevent Injustice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In a significant order reinforcing the protective intent of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the <strong>Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA)</strong> has ruled that <strong>the absence of a registered Agreement for Sale does not deprive a homebuyer of the right to a refund</strong>, particularly where retaining buyer money would result in injustice.</p>



<p>The ruling came in <strong>Complaint No. CC006000000303572</strong>, decided on <strong>20 January 2026</strong>, in a dispute involving the project <strong>Ajmeri Heights</strong>, located at <strong>Andheri (East), Mumbai</strong>, developed by <strong>Ajmeri Realty Pvt. Ltd.</strong> The complaint was filed by <strong>Deepesh Nair</strong>, a homebuyer who had paid a substantial portion of the flat consideration without ever receiving a registered Agreement for Sale.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Over 70% Collected Without Agreement, Clear Section 13 Violation</h3>



<p>As per the order, the complainant had paid <strong>₹64 lakh out of a total flat consideration of ₹87.24 lakh</strong> in <strong>2014</strong>, amounting to over <strong>70% of the total cost</strong>. Despite receiving these payments, the promoter failed to execute a <strong>registered Agreement for Sale</strong>, issuing only an <strong>undated allotment letter</strong>.</p>



<p>MahaRERA observed that this conduct amounted to a <strong>blatant violation of Section 13 of RERA</strong>, which prohibits promoters from accepting more than <strong>10% of the apartment cost</strong> without first entering into a registered Agreement for Sale.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Allotment Letter Has No Statutory Sanctity</h3>



<p>The authority reiterated that an <strong>allotment letter does not confer enforceable contractual rights</strong> under RERA. In the absence of a registered Agreement for Sale, there was:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>No binding possession date,</li>



<li>No defined obligations of the promoter, and</li>



<li>No contractual safeguards for the allottee.</li>
</ul>



<p>MahaRERA noted that such practices weaken buyer protection and cannot be permitted to defeat the purpose of the Act.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Section 18 Not Strictly Applicable, But Relief Cannot Be Denied</h3>



<p>While considering the refund claim, MahaRERA acknowledged that <strong>Section 18 of RERA</strong>, which governs refunds for delayed possession, ordinarily requires the existence of:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A registered Agreement for Sale, and</li>



<li>A contractually defined possession date.</li>
</ul>



<p>Since neither existed in the present case, the authority held that <strong>Section 18 could not be applied in its strict form</strong>. However, it categorically rejected the argument that this technical gap should allow the promoter to retain the buyer’s money indefinitely.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">MahaRERA Invokes Inherent Powers to Prevent Unjust Enrichment</h3>



<p>To ensure justice, MahaRERA invoked its <strong>inherent powers under Regulation 39 of the MahaRERA General Regulations, 2017</strong>, observing that RERA is a <strong>beneficial and social welfare legislation</strong>.</p>



<p>The authority held that allowing the promoter of <strong>Ajmeri Heights, Andheri</strong> to retain over ₹64 lakh without executing an agreement or offering possession would result in <strong>unjust enrichment</strong> and defeat the objectives of RERA.</p>



<p>Accordingly, MahaRERA directed <strong>Ajmeri Realty Pvt. Ltd.</strong> to:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Refund <strong>₹64,00,000</strong> to the complainant,</li>



<li>Pay <strong>interest at SBI MCLR + 2% per annum</strong> from the respective dates of payment made in 2014 until realization, and</li>



<li>Pay <strong>₹20,000 towards litigation costs</strong>,</li>



<li>Within <strong>30 days</strong> of the order.</li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Builder’s Absence Weighed Against Them</h3>



<p>The order records that the respondent developer:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Remained absent during proceedings,</li>



<li>Filed no written reply, and</li>



<li>Did not dispute receipt of the amounts paid.</li>
</ul>



<p>MahaRERA treated the complainant’s assertions as <strong>uncontroverted</strong>, strengthening the case for granting relief.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Supreme Court’s Newtech Judgment Distinguished</h3>



<p>MahaRERA also clarified that the Supreme Court’s ruling in <strong>Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd.</strong> was <strong>not applicable</strong> to the facts of this case, as that judgment presupposes the existence of a registered Agreement for Sale with a stipulated possession timeline — conditions absent in the Ajmeri Heights matter.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Why This Order Is a Big Signal for Homebuyers</h3>



<p>Legal experts say the order has wide implications for:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Pre-RERA bookings</strong>,</li>



<li>Projects where builders deliberately avoided executing agreements, and</li>



<li>Buyers trapped in long-stalled developments.</li>
</ul>



<p>The ruling makes it clear that <strong>promoters cannot take advantage of their own statutory violations</strong> and that MahaRERA will step in to ensure equity, even where technical requirements are missing due to the promoter’s fault.</p>



<p>Also Read: <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/maharera-orders-full-refund-with-interest-to-homebuyer-for-possession-delay/">MahaRERA Orders Full Refund with Interest to Homebuyer for Possession Delay</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/even-without-agreement-for-sale-maharera-can-order-refund-to-prevent-injustice/">Even Without Agreement for Sale, MahaRERA Can Order Refund to Prevent Injustice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
