<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tall building approval Archives - Square Feat India</title>
	<atom:link href="https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/tall-building-approval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/tag/tall-building-approval/</link>
	<description>Real Estate News Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>&#x1f3e2; Developers Get Relief: 120–180 m Towers on Big Plots No Longer Need High-Rise Committee Approval</title>
		<link>https://squarefeatindia.com/%f0%9f%8f%a2-developers-get-relief-120-180-m-towers-on-big-plots-no-longer-need-high-rise-committee-approval/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareFeatIndia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Realty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building height norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCPR 2034]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-Rise Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing policy Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mumbai Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai redevelopment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal commissioner powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate news India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redevelopment policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tall building approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban development]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://squarefeatindia.com/?p=10114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a major policy shift, Maharashtra has allowed 120–180 m buildings on plots above 2,000 sq.m to skip High-Rise Committee clearance. Municipal Commissioner can now approve these projects directly — a move expected to speed up redevelopment and reduce delays in Mumbai’s real estate sector.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/%f0%9f%8f%a2-developers-get-relief-120-180-m-towers-on-big-plots-no-longer-need-high-rise-committee-approval/">&#x1f3e2; Developers Get Relief: 120–180 m Towers on Big Plots No Longer Need High-Rise Committee Approval</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In a move that could significantly <strong>speed up building approvals in Mumbai</strong>, the Maharashtra government has amended <strong>Regulation 19(2A)</strong> of the <strong>Development Control and Promotion Regulations (DCPR) 2034</strong>, easing clearance requirements for high-rise buildings between <strong>120 and 180 metres</strong> tall.</p>



<p>Under the new rules,&nbsp;<strong>projects on plots measuring 2,000 sq.m or more</strong>&nbsp;will no longer require mandatory approval from the&nbsp;<strong>High-Rise Committee (HRC)</strong>&nbsp;— a key technical body that has historically scrutinised tall building proposals. Instead, these proposals can now be&nbsp;<strong>cleared directly by the Municipal Commissioner</strong>, provided they meet structural certification norms.</p>



<p>The Urban Development Department issued this notification on&nbsp;<strong>10 October 2025</strong>&nbsp;under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the&nbsp;<strong>Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act, 1966</strong>.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4dc.png" alt="📜" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />&nbsp;<strong>Earlier Rule: HRC Approval Was Mandatory for All 120 m+ Towers</strong></h3>



<p>Under the previous regulatory framework:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Any building taller than 120 m</strong>, or with a <strong>slenderness ratio of 9 or more</strong>, had to be referred to the <strong>High-Rise Committee</strong>.</li>



<li>The HRC reviewed structural safety, wind impact, fire safety, planning compliance, and overall feasibility.</li>



<li>Municipal Commissioners could not approve such towers independently, even for <strong>standard high-rise designs</strong> that routinely passed HRC scrutiny.</li>



<li>This process often led to <strong>months-long delays</strong>, as developers waited for committee meetings, site visits, and clearances.</li>
</ul>



<p>This blanket requirement applied uniformly across Greater Mumbai, regardless of the&nbsp;<strong>plot size</strong>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<strong>complexity of the structure</strong>. Even straightforward mid-height towers were stuck in the same bureaucratic pipeline as supertall buildings above 200 m.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f195.png" alt="🆕" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />&nbsp;<strong>New Rule: Municipal Commissioner Can Clear 120–180 m Towers on Big Plots</strong></h3>



<p>The new notification introduces a&nbsp;<strong>clear distinction</strong>&nbsp;for mid-height high-rises:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>For buildings <strong>between 120 m and 180 m in height</strong></li>



<li>On <strong>plots of 2,000 sq.m or more</strong><br><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f449.png" alt="👉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <strong>Municipal Commissioner is now empowered to grant approval</strong> directly, without referring the case to the High-Rise Committee.</li>
</ul>



<p>However, developers must submit:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Structural Design</strong> and</li>



<li><strong>Geo-Technical Reports</strong><br>certified by <strong>two independent experts</strong> — either experienced structural engineers or professors from <strong>IIT Bombay</strong>, <strong>SPCE (Andheri)</strong>, or <strong>VJTI (Matunga)</strong>.</li>
</ul>



<p>Developers may&nbsp;<strong>still opt</strong>&nbsp;to take HRC’s advice if they want multiple expert opinions, but it’s no longer mandatory.</p>



<p>For&nbsp;<strong>plots smaller than 2,000 sq.m</strong>, the&nbsp;<strong>old rule still applies</strong>&nbsp;— HRC clearance remains compulsory. Similarly, for&nbsp;<strong>buildings taller than 180 m</strong>, HRC scrutiny continues to be mandatory as before.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f3d9.png" alt="🏙" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />&nbsp;<strong>Why This Matters: Faster Redevelopment &amp; Real Estate Boost</strong></h3>



<p>This policy shift is particularly significant for&nbsp;<strong>Mumbai’s redevelopment-heavy real estate market</strong>, where&nbsp;<strong>mid-height towers between 120–180 m are increasingly common</strong>.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f3d7.png" alt="🏗" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <strong>Faster Clearances</strong>: By bypassing HRC for standard mid-height towers, project approvals could be <strong>shortened by several months</strong>. This helps <strong>redevelopment societies</strong>, especially in the <strong>eastern and western suburbs</strong>, where delays often inflate costs and timelines.</li>



<li><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4dd.png" alt="📝" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <strong>Decentralised Power</strong>: The Municipal Commissioner now has <strong>greater authority</strong>, reducing bottlenecks at the state level.</li>



<li><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f4b0.png" alt="💰" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <strong>Cost Savings</strong>: Less time spent waiting for approvals = lower holding costs, faster construction starts, and potentially better cash flows for developers.</li>



<li><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f3e2.png" alt="🏢" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <strong>Redevelopment Acceleration</strong>: Many <strong>cluster and society redevelopment projects</strong> fall within this 120–180 m bracket on larger plots. This could <strong>unlock stalled or delayed projects</strong>.</li>



<li><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f9f1.png" alt="🧱" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <strong>Predictability</strong>: Developers can now plan their projects with <strong>greater certainty</strong>, knowing approvals are more streamlined for this category.</li>
</ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/2696.png" alt="⚖" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />&nbsp;<strong>Safeguards Remain Intact</strong></h3>



<p>While the rule relaxes HRC approval, it maintains&nbsp;<strong>structural safety checks</strong>&nbsp;through mandatory expert certification. The amendment is also&nbsp;<strong>subject to the final outcome</strong>&nbsp;of Writ Petition No. 3186/2019 (Urban Design Research Institute vs State), currently before the Bombay High Court.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f306.png" alt="🌆" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />&nbsp;<strong>The Bigger Picture</strong></h3>



<p>Mumbai’s vertical growth has often been slowed not just by land scarcity, but by&nbsp;<strong>lengthy approval procedures</strong>. By&nbsp;<strong>decentralising authority</strong>&nbsp;and focusing HRC’s attention on&nbsp;<strong>truly complex and supertall buildings</strong>, the government aims to&nbsp;<strong>balance speed with safety</strong>.</p>



<p>With redevelopment driving the city’s housing supply — especially under DCPR 2034 and cluster schemes — this change could become a&nbsp;<strong>turning point for faster urban renewal</strong>.</p>



<p>Also Read: <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/fire-in-mumbai-highrise-builder-says-fire-audit-conducted-on-oct-1/">Fire in Mumbai Highrise, Builder Says Fire Audit Conducted on Oct 1</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com/%f0%9f%8f%a2-developers-get-relief-120-180-m-towers-on-big-plots-no-longer-need-high-rise-committee-approval/">&#x1f3e2; Developers Get Relief: 120–180 m Towers on Big Plots No Longer Need High-Rise Committee Approval</a> appeared first on <a href="https://squarefeatindia.com">Square Feat India</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
