In a case that sheds light on inter-developer disputes affecting Mumbai homebuyers, the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has restored a complaint against Shapoorji Pallonji Real Estate after the complainant alleged that the Olympia C D project in Mulund remained a non-starter due to disagreements between Shapoorji Pallonji and Nirmal Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd.


🔹 Case Background

The complainant, Arun Nishad, had booked Flat No. 1601 in Tower D of the Olympia project and claimed to have paid more than 10% of the flat’s consideration amount. He sought a refund along with interest under Section 18 of the RERA Act, citing the developer’s failure to commence construction.

The complaint, filed originally in October 2022, was dismissed earlier in March 2025 after Nishad remained absent for two consecutive hearings.


🔹 Restoration and Fresh Hearing

In September 2025, the complainant filed a restoration application, explaining that technical glitches had prevented his participation in earlier hearings.

Hearing the plea on October 28, 2025, MahaRERA Member Mahesh Pathak allowed the restoration, citing principles of natural justice. The regulator noted that despite being notified, no one from Shapoorji Pallonji Real Estate appeared during the hearing or filed any response opposing the restoration.


🔹 MahaRERA’s Directions

MahaRERA has now:

  • Restored the original complaint to its previous stage.
  • Directed Shapoorji Pallonji Real Estate to file its reply within three weeks (by November 18, 2025).
  • Allowed the complainant time till December 9, 2025, to file his rejoinder.
  • Scheduled the final hearing for December 23, 2025.
  • Instructed the Registry to verify the project’s “kept in abeyance” status with the registration department.

🔹 Project Background: Olympia C D, Mulund

The Olympia C D project, located on LBS Road, Mulund (West), was registered by Shapoorji Pallonji Real Estate.
However, as per multiple buyer complaints, the project has been stalled due to disputes between the developer and Nirmal Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd., the original landowner and development partner. The delay has left several homebuyers awaiting clarity and refunds.


🔹 What Happens Next

The case will now proceed for final arguments in December 2025, where MahaRERA will examine the refund claim, the developer’s explanation, and the impact of the inter-developer dispute on possession timelines.

The order emphasizes that MahaRERA continues to uphold procedural fairness — ensuring that even dismissed cases can be revived when valid technical or procedural issues are demonstrated.

Also Read: Nirmal Asked To Pay Interest To Homebuyers

You May Also Like

BJP Wants to Extend the Self-Redevelopment Policy for SRA Too

Mumbai BJP chief MLA Ameet Satam has called for the extension of the self-redevelopment policy to SRA projects. If approved, the move could speed up redevelopment for 286 slum buildings in Chandivali and benefit lakhs of Mumbaikars.

MahaRERA Drafts Model Guidelines on Regulation of Retirement Homes

To ensure housing projects for retired and senior citizens are built keeping…

PE Investments in Indian RE Register Decline of ~12% in 1H FY24

The average ticket size of private equity investments into the Indian real…

Gudi Padwa new launches on hold due to corona

Gudi Padwa is a festival that developers wait for. Being an auspicious…