Taxman Says Builder Had Black Money, Turns Out He Was Paying Labourers in Cash
ITAT Mumbai has dismissed the tax department’s claim of black money against F A Construction, holding that large cash withdrawals were legitimately used to pay daily-wage labourers at remote construction sites. The Tribunal quashed additions of over ₹35 crore under Section 69A, emphasizing documented bank sources and no adverse findings in remand — proving once again that cash-heavy sectors like construction often face initial suspicion that clears with proper evidence.
Don’t Book Before the Developer-Society Deal is Sealed: Khar Homebuyers Paid the Price with No Interest on Refund
In a January 2026 ruling, MahaRERA directed Parthesh Developers to refund full amounts paid by buyers Rajiv Dayal and Ashok/Jyoti Narang in the lapsed Ganga Jamna Sangam project — but without interest. The Authority cited the absence of a registered Agreement for Sale and the fact that 2010 allotment letters were issued before the 2011 redevelopment agreement, rendering transactions preliminary and ineligible for statutory interest.
Cancellation Loss Allowed – But Only in the Right Year: Key ITAT Ruling for Mumbai Builders
ITAT Mumbai has clarified that real estate developers can claim losses from cancelled bookings, but only in the financial year the reversal actually occurs — and only after proving no double deduction. The ruling also protects old scrutiny assessments from being invalidated due to Income Tax Department jurisdiction changes during cadre restructuring.