In a significant order reinforcing homebuyers’ rights under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has directed the promoter of the Godrej 24 project at Hinjawadi, Pune, to permanently rectify seepage and structural defects in an allotted flat, invoking Section 14(3) of RERA.

The direction came while disposing of a set of four complaints filed against Pearlite Real Properties Private Limited, the promoter of the project registered under MahaRERA No. P52100001005. While three complaints were rejected on different legal grounds, MahaRERA partly allowed one complaint solely on the issue of seepage, underlining that a promoter’s responsibility for structural defects continues even after possession.


The Seepage Complaint: What the Homebuyer Alleged

The seepage-related grievance arose from Complaint No. CC12502913, filed by an allottee of Flat No. 1402, Building G1, who had taken possession of the flat in August 2022.

The homebuyer alleged that:

  • Severe seepage in the living room was noticed from November 2021
  • The issue was repeatedly reported to the promoter with photographs
  • The complaint was raised well within the defect liability period
  • Despite multiple site visits, the promoter only carried out temporary and cosmetic repairs, such as repainting and removal of damp plaster
  • The seepage continued to recur, affecting habitability and interior finishes

Builder’s Defence: Repairs Were Done

The promoter argued that:

  • The seepage issue was attended to on multiple occasions
  • The defect was linked to waterproofing problems in the flat above
  • Necessary repair work was undertaken and would continue as required
  • Therefore, no further relief was warranted

However, MahaRERA was not convinced.


MahaRERA’s Key Finding: Temporary Repairs Are Not Enough

After examining submissions and records, MahaRERA held that repeated recurrence of seepage itself indicates that the root cause has not been resolved.

The Authority observed that:

  • Section 14(3) of RERA imposes a statutory and continuing obligation on promoters
  • Merely carrying out surface-level repairs does not amount to compliance
  • The promoter’s responsibility continues until permanent rectification is achieved

This interpretation is crucial, as seepage and waterproofing defects are among the most common post-possession complaints faced by homebuyers across projects.


Section 14(3) of RERA Explained Simply

Under Section 14(3) of RERA:

  • If a structural defect or defect in workmanship, quality, or services is brought to the promoter’s notice
  • Within five years from the date of possession
  • The promoter must rectify the defect at its own cost
  • Within 30 days, failing which compensation becomes payable

MahaRERA reaffirmed that this provision applies even after possession, and promoters cannot evade liability by claiming that the flat has already been handed over.


The Final Direction

MahaRERA ordered that:

  • The promoter must permanently rectify the seepage and structural defects
  • Entirely at its own cost
  • Within 30 days from the date of the order (2 January 2026)

The Authority further warned that:

  • Non-compliance would attract penal action under Section 63 of RERA, which deals with penalties for failure to comply with Authority’s directions

Why This Order Matters for Homebuyers

This ruling sends a clear message to both developers and homebuyers:

  • Possession does not end a builder’s liability for construction defects
  • Cosmetic fixes cannot be passed off as permanent solutions
  • Section 14(3) is an enforceable remedy, not a symbolic provision
  • Homebuyers can approach MahaRERA for effective relief, even years after possession, provided the complaint falls within the defect liability period

Bigger Implication

By strictly enforcing Section 14(3), MahaRERA has reaffirmed that quality of construction is a continuing responsibility, and that promoters cannot rely on delay, possession, or partial repairs to avoid accountability. The order is likely to guide similar seepage and structural defect disputes across Maharashtra.

Also Read: MahaRERA asks Developers to mediate with Developers of lapsed housing projects

You May Also Like

🏗️ Realty Stocks Open Steady as Markets Resume; Early Trades Reflect Caution and Selective Buying

Realty stocks opened on a steady note as large developers held firm and mid-caps showed mixed movement. Investors await intraday triggers to guide the sector through the rest of the trading session.

4 Reasons why NRIs should invest in real estate

Non-resident Indians (NRIs) have taken a keen interest in the property market…

Awfis H1 FY26 Operating EBITDA Jumps 44% YoY; Revenue Up 28% Amid Strong Enterprise Demand

Awfis Space Solutions reported strong financial performance in H1 FY26, with operating EBITDA up 44% YoY and revenue up 28%. The company expanded its portfolio to 247 centers with 1.7 lakh seats and announced the subsidiarization of Awfis Transform to drive its next growth phase.

Homebuyer Wins Relief: Developer Ordered to Fix Structural Issues in Flat

A Mumbai homebuyer, Palvinder Singh, has secured a partial victory against developer Mohan Lifespaces LLP, with MahaRERA ordering the rectification of structural defects in his flat. While a refund request was denied due to the timely issuance of the Occupancy Certificate and delayed possession by the buyer, the Authority mandated the developer to fix issues like wall cracks and tile problems within 30 days, upholding Section 14(3) of the RERA Act.