In a move that may affect homebuyers, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) has allowed a developer, Runwal Developers Pvt. Ltd., to proceed with an appeal against orders from the MahaRERA, despite a significant delay in filing it.

The case involves a dispute between the developer and homebuyers, Mr. and Mrs. Amar Ochani. The MahaRERA had issued a first order against the developer on July 4, 2022. The developer stated they were not officially informed of this order and only found out about it from the MahaRERA website on August 18, 2022.

Instead of filing an immediate appeal, the developer filed a review application on December 6, 2022. This review was decided on November 8, 2024, but the developer claimed they were again not officially notified, learning of the decision on November 30, 2024, through a letter from the homebuyers’ lawyer.

The developer’s appeal was eventually filed on February 25, 2025. The homebuyers argued that this was a tactic to prolong the case and that the developer had failed to provide a sufficient reason for the delay. They pointed out that the review application itself was filed with a delay of 109 days, while the mandatory period for review is 45 days.

However, the Tribunal accepted the developer’s reasoning, concluding that the developer had acted with “bonafide intent” and pursued a “lawful remedy available under the RERA Act” by filing the review application. The court decided that the time spent on the review—from December 6, 2022, to November 30, 2024—should not be counted against the appeal’s limitation period.

The Tribunal’s decision was based on the principle of providing “substantial justice” and avoiding a “pedantic approach” to every day of delay. It determined there was no evidence of negligence or “dilatory tactics” on the part of the developer.

As a condition of allowing the appeal, the Tribunal ordered the developer to pay a cost of ₹10,000 to the homebuyers within two weeks. This payment is a “condition precedent” for the order to stand.

This ruling means that while the homebuyers will receive a small compensation for the delay, the legal battle will continue, as the developer’s appeal will now be decided on its merits.

Also Read: MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal Orders Developer to Refund Buyers, Rejects Cancellation Fee

You May Also Like

Soft possession without OC is not lawful possession: MahaREAT rules in favour of homebuyer

In a major win for homebuyers, MahaREAT has ruled that “soft possession” without an Occupation Certificate does not count as lawful possession under RERA.

Buying a House? Beware! These Real Estate Projects Are Up for De-registration

If you’re looking to buy a home in Maharashtra, you need to be cautious! MahaRERA has announced the de-registration of five real estate projects, potentially affecting homebuyers and investors. If you have concerns, you have only 30 days to submit objections. Find out which projects are affected and how you can act to protect your investment.

Rents continue to increase 16% YoY and 2.8% QoQ

Magicbricks, released its Rental Update (January-March 2024), report revealing a 16% YoY…

WeWork India Raises INR 500 Crore via Rights Issue to Reduce Debt

WeWork India has successfully raised INR 500 crore through a rights issue, focusing on debt repayment and strengthening its financial position. CEO Karan Virwani emphasized that the move underscores investor confidence and supports long-term growth. Operating in eight cities, WeWork India offers over 1 lakh desks, catering to businesses of all sizes.