The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has dismissed multiple complaints filed by homebuyers against Evalia Projects and Development Pvt. Ltd. and its associates, ruling that contracts signed before the implementation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) cannot be overridden by its provisions. However, the authority granted relief to one homebuyer whose complaint was backed by a registered agreement for sale.

Why MahaRERA Dismissed the Complaints:

  • The dismissed complaints were based on pre-RERA contracts, specifically Letters of Intent (LOI), which included clauses for arbitration and predefined exit procedures.
  • MahaRERA ruled that homebuyers had voluntarily agreed to these terms before RERA came into force, and therefore, their claims could not be considered under the Act.
  • The authority emphasized that it cannot rewrite the terms of contracts signed before RERA’s enactment, upholding the validity of pre-RERA dispute resolution mechanisms.

Relief Granted to One Homebuyer for Delayed Possession:

One homebuyer (Complainant No. 5) had a registered agreement for sale dated January 10, 2020, with a promised possession date of March 31, 2020. Since the developer failed to deliver possession and has not obtained an Occupancy Certificate (OC), MahaRERA ruled that the complainant is entitled to interest compensation from April 1, 2020, until actual handover with OC.

Project Lapses and Developer’s Obligations:

  • The VIDA BLDG B-1 project’s registration lapsed on September 30, 2020, and the developer has not taken steps for renewal.
  • MahaRERA directed the developer to seek an extension within 30 days or face penalties under Section 63 of RERA.

Implications for Homebuyers:

This ruling highlights the limitations of RERA for homebuyers with pre-RERA contracts and underscores the importance of having a registered sale agreement to claim relief under the Act. It also reinforces that developers are liable for delays and must compensate buyers when possession is not delivered on time.

Also Read: Not Cancelling Flat On Time, Proves Costly For Nirmal

You May Also Like

Only ₹11 Fine Each on Two Top BMC Officials for Delaying Court Orders to Demolish Illegal Structures

In a stinging order, the Bombay High Court imposed a token ₹11 cost each on two senior BMC officials for delaying compliance with its directions to demolish an illegal mezzanine floor in Kirti Chambers, Fort — underlining that civic authorities cannot treat court orders casually.

Warehousing and Logistics Sector H1 2023 recorded 49% of total absorption registered over the entire previous year.

Warehousing and Logistics Sector H1 2023 recorded 49% of total absorption registered…

BMC Pins Loss Of Real-Estate Revenue On MHADA.

BMC in its book of budget estimate stated, after MHADA was appointed…

Mumbai Property Registrations Down 11% MoM in Aug 2025; Stamp Duty Revenue Slips 19% to ₹1,000 Cr

Mumbai’s August 2025 property registrations fell to 11,230 and stamp duty to ₹1,000 crore, down 11% and 19% month-on-month. The dip signals a demand pause ahead of the festive season, with pricing and offers set to decide the next leg.