Salman Khan is in the news for reasons related to the threat to his life from the Lawrence Bishnoi gang.

Meanwhile, his sister Arpita Khan is making headlines for her real estate deal.

Arpita sold her home in Bandra for ₹22 crore.

The house she sold is in the building named Satguru’s Flying Carpet.

This journalist had written an article in 2017 when she bought it.

The details of the property include a flat spread over the 13th and 14th floors of the building, measuring 427.50 sq meters.

While Salman’s sister is the seller, the buyer is Shivaya Cineswise. The new buyer will also have access to nine car parks in the building.

The documentation was carried out on October 10, while the sale agreement was registered on October 15.

A stamp duty of ₹1.32 crore was paid for the registration of the sale agreement.

Also Read: Salman Khan to get ₹1.04 Cr Average rent for 60 months from this property

You May Also Like

5-Year Ban on Housing Society Office Bearers for Withholding Records

Bombay High Court has upheld the five-year ban on the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer of a Mumbai housing society for deliberately withholding meeting minutes and records from a fellow committee member, reinforcing transparency norms under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act.

These are Mumbai’s 15 Most Dangerous Buildings

Like every year, even this year MHADA has come up with a…

Amitabh Bachchan Buys 2.67-Acre Land in Ayodhya for ₹35 Crore from House of Abhinandan Lodha

Amitabh Bachchan has acquired a 2.67-acre land parcel in Ayodhya for ₹35 crore from House of Abhinandan Lodha, marking his third investment in the temple city. The deal reflects growing investor interest in Ayodhya’s rapidly emerging real estate market driven by tourism and infrastructure development.

If You’re a Loan Guarantor, Your Property Can Be Attached and Auctioned — Even If You Move Court, Rules Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has ruled that cooperative societies can legally attach and auction a guarantor’s property for unpaid loans — even if the guarantor files a civil case. The judgment clarifies that civil courts have no jurisdiction once recovery begins under the MCS Act.