In a significant clarification with major implications for Mumbai’s old chawl residents, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA), Mumbai, has informed the Maharashtra Government that no policy currently exists for rehabilitating first-floor residents of authorized chawls under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. As a result, not a single such chawl has been redeveloped or surveyed to date. The letter is dated Nov 27, 2025.

The update comes in response to a query raised by government, who had written to the government seeking clarity on rehabilitation rights for first-floor occupants of pre-1976 chawls.

The SRA’s detailed response was addressed to Rajendra R. Desai, Under Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, and provides a rare official admission of a long-standing policy void that affects thousands of families living in old Mumbai chawls.


Key Government Clarifications

1. No Financial Burden on Government

The SRA stated unequivocally that the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme is a self-financing model.
This means:

  • State Government will face no direct or indirect financial burden even if rehabilitation benefits are extended to first-floor tenants.
  • Developers cross-subsidize rehabilitation through free-sale components.

This clarification answers the Finance Department’s concern about fiscal impact.


2. No Policy for First-Floor Chawl Residents — Hence No Redevelopment

One of the most crucial disclosures:

  • There is currently no government policy for first-floor residents of authorized chawls existing on or before 1 January 1976.
  • Because no policy exists:
    • No redevelopment of such chawls has ever been carried out under SRA
    • No eligibility surveys have been conducted

This revelation highlights a long-standing gap in Mumbai’s rehabilitation framework, potentially leaving first-floor tenants in limbo for decades.


3. No Budgetary Allocation Required

The SRA reiterated that since the scheme is self-funded, no budgetary provision is made for this category of rehabilitation.


Why This Matters

Mumbai has hundreds of pre-1976 chawls, many with first-floor residents who have lived there for generations. While ground-floor tenements are recognized as eligible for SRA rehabilitation based on the 1976 cutoff, first-floor occupants remain policy orphans.

This clarification confirms:

  • These families receive no automatic protection or right to free rehabilitation units
  • Developers cannot officially include them in rehab calculations
  • Redevelopment proposals remain stalled or legally vulnerable

Stakeholders — especially in North Mumbai where former MP Gopal Shetty raised the issue — argue this creates discrimination between equally old residents of the same structure.


Next Steps: Government Must Frame a Policy

With the SRA formally stating the policy gap, pressure is expected to mount on the Housing Department to:

  • Create a clear rehabilitation eligibility framework
  • Conduct baseline surveys of first-floor chawls
  • Enable stalled redevelopment proposals to proceed

Until then, thousands of first-floor chawl residents remain without clarity on their future in any redevelopment project.

Also Read: Bombay High Court Caps Construction at ‘The Imperial’ Tardeo, After Residents Object

You May Also Like

Mt. K Kapital Launches USD 450 Million India Credit Fund to Boost Real Estate Investments Across Key Growth Markets

Mt. K Kapital has announced a new USD 450 million real estate credit fund aimed at expanding investments across India’s major real estate markets, including Mumbai, NCR, Pune, and Bengaluru. Backed by strong institutional participation, the firm targets deployment by early 2026.

Payment Default by Homebuyers: MahaRERA Upholds Builder’s Right to Cancel Allotments

MahaRERA has ruled that homebuyers who repeatedly default on payments risk losing their flats, upholding a builder’s right to cancel allotments under Section 11(5) of the RERA Act.

Anul Malik Buys Bandra Flat for Rs 13.5 Crore

Music Composer and reality show judge Anu Malik along with his wife…

Registrar Cannot Decide Ownership Disputes or Force Housing Societies to Issue Maintenance Bills

A shop dispute dating back to the 1990s has led to a landmark Bombay High Court ruling limiting the powers of the Registrar, holding that ownership disputes cannot be forced onto housing societies through administrative orders.