Browsing Tag

Bombay High Court

173 posts
Maharashtra forms an 11-member panel to audit the 1971 Slum Act and submit recommendations on slum redevelopment within 10 months.

Maharashtra Forms Expert Committee to Audit 1971 Slum Act, Gives 10 Months for Recommendations

Maharashtra forms an 11-member panel to audit the 1971 Slum Act and submit recommendations on slum redevelopment within 10 months.
Bombay HC largely upholds award in favour of Goregaon Pearl society against developer, confirms termination and ₹7.08 cr claim, but directs refund of additional FSI purchase costs.

Bombay HC upholds Goregaon Pearl society’s termination of developer, orders FSI cost refund

Bombay HC largely upholds award in favour of Goregaon Pearl society against developer, confirms termination and ₹7.08 cr claim, but directs refund of additional FSI purchase costs.
Bombay High Court dismisses developer’s challenge and holds that future additional FSI cannot be used to indefinitely delay deemed conveyance to housing societies.

Big Win for Homebuyers: No More Delaying Conveyance Over Additional FSI

Bombay High Court dismisses developer’s challenge and holds that future additional FSI cannot be used to indefinitely delay deemed conveyance to housing societies.
Bombay HC largely upholds award in favour of Goregaon Pearl society against developer, confirms termination and ₹7.08 cr claim, but directs refund of additional FSI purchase costs.

Bombay HC: Dy Registrar Cannot Cancel Society Membership or Decide Flat Ownership in Title Disputes

Bombay HC: Dy Registrar has no power under Sec 79 to cancel membership or decide ownership when serious title dispute exists over flat.
MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.

Paid ₹1.5 Crore, Got No Flat: MahaRERA Rejects Buyer’s Claim Against New Developer

In a setback for homebuyers in redevelopment projects, MahaRERA has dismissed a complaint by a buyer who paid ₹1.5 crore to the original developer. The Authority ruled that the new developer cannot be held liable after the society lawfully terminated the old agreement, leaving the buyer to pursue remedies only against Zaveri Constructions.