Browsing Tag

maharera order

23 posts
MahaRERA questions Lodha’s decision to skip 13th floor numbering in Amara project citing superstition, but rejects all reliefs sought by the housing society.

Builder Sells 13th Floor Flats as 14th Calling 13 Inauspicious, Homebuyers Move MahaRERA

MahaRERA questions Lodha’s decision to skip 13th floor numbering in Amara project citing superstition, but rejects all reliefs sought by the housing society.
MahaRERA has allowed deregistration of Prithvi Sneh project but made it clear that the builder remains liable for all previous orders and cannot escape past liabilities.

RERA Deregistration Does Not Absolve Builder of Past Liabilities: MahaRERA

MahaRERA has allowed deregistration of Prithvi Sneh project but made it clear that the builder remains liable for all previous orders and cannot escape past liabilities.
Bombay HC rules flat agreements don’t give land ownership to societies, sets aside decades-old Thane dispute.

Homebuyers Beware: Unregistered MOU + Project Change = Zero Rights in MahaRERA

MahaRERA has dismissed a complaint seeking interest on ₹1.53 crore paid in 2011, ruling that an old unregistered MOU offers no protection when a project undergoes major changes through a Joint Development Agreement.
In a 21-year-long battle, the Maharashtra Co-operative Appellate Court has ordered full vacant possession of Flat No. 702 in Suyog Darshan Society, Versova to Mohan Kubal, directing auction of remaining articles and appointing a new Court Receiver.

Mumbai Homebuyers Wait 16 Years for Flats, Finally Gets Relief

Family paid ₹4.22 crore in 2010 for Godrej project flats. MahaRERA rejects Godrej’s objections, orders Agreement for Sale execution and delay interest after 16 years.
A Mumbai housewife received a shocking ₹55 lakh tax demand on a flat she never paid for. Her only fault? Her name was on the agreement. What happened next will relieve many Indian families...

MahaRERA Dismisses Neighbour’s Complaint Against Real Estate Project: “Not an Allottee, No Locus Standi”

MahaRERA has rejected a complaint filed by a resident of a neighbouring project against Impulse Buildcon, ruling that a non-allottee has no locus standi to challenge construction on reserved amenities space under the RERA Act.