MahaRERA Restores Case Against Developer Over Delayed Possession in Mumbai

MahaRERA has reinstated a non-compliance case against Kavya Mira Realty for failing to hand over possession of a property as per its 2021 order. The February 12, 2025, ruling directs the case to the Adjudicating Officer, ensuring the developer fulfills its obligations. The decision underscores MahaRERA’s commitment to protecting homebuyers from project delays and non-compliance issues.

MahaRERA Issues Notice for Objections on Deregistration of Eight Real Estate Projects

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has issued a notice inviting objections regarding the deregistration of eight real estate projects across the state. The projects, promoted by developers including Avishkar Developers, Anshul Bhosale Realty, and VSK Builders, are spread across Pune, Thane, Ratnagiri, Aurangabad, Kolhapur, Osmanabad, and Ulhasnagar. Homebuyers affected by these developments have been given 30 days to raise objections. The deregistration could impact property investments, and buyers are urged to verify their project status and respond accordingly.

MahaRERA Dismisses Complaints Due to Pre-RERA Contracts,

MahaRERA has ruled that homebuyers with pre-RERA contracts cannot seek relief under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the terms of these agreements remain binding. However, a homebuyer with a registered sale agreement has been awarded interest compensation for delayed possession.

MahaRERA Dismisses Homebuyers’ Refund Plea as They Relinquished Property to Lender

MahaRERA has ruled that homebuyers who relinquish their property to a lender lose their right to claim refunds from the developer. In a case involving the Zeal Regency project, two buyers sought a refund after the project was delayed, but MahaRERA dismissed their plea, citing that they had surrendered ownership to the lender, who later auctioned the flat.

MahaRERA Clarifies: Possession Without an OC is Not Legally Recognized

MahaRERA has clarified that possession of a property without an Occupancy Certificate (OC) is not legally valid. In a case involving the LEO Group Housing Complex, the regulatory body ruled that homebuyers living in such properties do not hold legal possession. The authority has imposed penalties on the developer and allowed affected buyers to claim compensation for delayed possession.