Browsing Tag

MahaRERA

435 posts
In a major victory for homebuyers, MahaREAT has overturned MahaRERA's order in the Cavansite project case, ruling that the possession date in a registered agreement is sacrosanct and cannot be changed by any authority without mutual consent.

Builder Skips RERA Hearings, Homebuyers Win Ex-Parte Refund Order

Despite repeated notices and opportunities, the promoter neither appeared nor filed any reply, forcing MahaRERA to pass an ex-parte order granting relief to the homebuyers.
MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal rules that settlement on possession & payment does not waive homebuyer’s right to RERA delay interest unless explicitly recorded.

Settlement on Possession & Payment Does NOT Waive Homebuyer’s Right to Interest on Delayed Possession

MahaRERA Appellate Tribunal rules that settlement on possession & payment does not waive homebuyer’s right to RERA delay interest unless explicitly recorded.
MahaRERA

Lease Deed, No Sale Agreement: MahaRERA Hears Case Anyway

In a significant ruling, MahaRERA heard a complaint based on a Lease Deed (not a sale agreement) despite the promoter’s jurisdiction challenge, but ultimately dismissed it citing a binding settlement of ₹6.25 lakhs executed in 2019. The order serves as a cautionary tale for homebuyers on the finality of settlements and the importance of documentation.
MahaRERA rejected a review filed after four years, highlighting why delay and weak legal grounds can defeat your case.

Real Estate Agent Loses RERA Case for Brokerage

In a landmark order, MahaRERA has ruled that brokerage disputes between real estate agents and developers fall outside its jurisdiction and must be pursued in civil courts. The Authority rejected the agent’s claim due to the absence of a written agreement and complex factual questions involved.
MahaRERA

Builder Drags Homebuyers to MahaRERA for Non-Payment, Gets Flats Cancelled & Money Forfeited

Pune developer Gera Developments dragged two homebuyers to MahaRERA for non-payment of installments. The authority cancelled both agreements but allowed the builder to forfeit only 2% instead of the demanded 10% plus charges.