This should end the debate whether a developer can sell open parking space or not. Now it’s in written that a developer is not allowed to sell or allot a parking space for monetary considerations.

By Varun Singh

This debate, whether a developer can sell or allot open parking spaces has always been the bone of contention between homebuyers and the builder community. 

Many home buyers are always seen complaining that they have been sold and open parking space.

Even MahaRERA claims that on several occasions it has been brought to the authority is notice, that builders sell or allot open parking area for monetary consideration.

This forced the MahaRERA to come out with a circular clearly giving out statements that a developer is not entitled to sell or allot open parking area for monetary considerations.

The circular by MahaRERA further states, that there have been disputes on the exact location of the parking space vis a vis the apartment.

“In view of the above, it is therefore, felt necessary to issue this circular clarifying the following,” read the MahaRERA circular.

The reasons cited by MahaRERA are as follows.

  • Open parking areas are provided free of FSI;
  • Promoters are not entitled to sell/allot open parking areas for monetary consideration;
  • Open parking areas, garage and covered Parking spaces should be specifically marked and numbered at the real estate project site in accordance and as per approved / sanctioned plans and tagged to the apartment to which it is allotted; and
  • Garage/or covered parking space when sold/allotted for monetary consideration, the type, numbers and size as well as the place where such garage or covered parking space is situated should be mentioned in the Agreement for Sale being entered into and the plan showing the exact location / allotment along with the particulars as aforesaid should be annexed to the Agreement for Sale.

Failure to comply with the MahaRERA directions shall be considered as violations of the provisions RERA and actions shall be taken against those violators. 

Also Read: Builder Takes MHADA To MahaRERA, Gets No Relief

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Homebuyer Sought Refund, MahaRERA Awarded Possession with Interest: Tribunal Steps In to Undo Injustice

In a pro-justice move, MahaREAT condoned delay in a homebuyer’s appeal, recognizing MahaRERA’s error in awarding possession instead of the requested refund, and will now hear the matter on merits to prevent injustice on technical grounds.

Old Building Demolished, But Tenancy Lives On

In a nuanced judgment, the Bombay High Court held that demolition of a dilapidated building does not terminate a protected tenancy under Maharashtra law — the right survives over the land — yet restored eviction in favour of a retired landlord who proved genuine personal need and long-term non-use by the tenant, overturning the lower appellate court’s dismissal.

State Forms High-Level Panel to Review Dumping Grounds Near Homes After Bombay HC’s Strong Orders

The Maharashtra government has set up a high-level committee led by the Chief Secretary after the Bombay High Court pulled up authorities over dumping grounds located near residential areas. The panel will examine BMC’s waste-management plan and recommend long-term solutions.

MahaRERA Cannot Decide Issues Relating to Eviction or Recovery of Flat

MahaRERA has ruled that eviction, flat recovery, and agreement-cancellation fall outside its jurisdiction. In the Amity Apartments case, the Authority dismissed the promoter’s complaint — clarifying that such civil-property disputes must be addressed in civil courts, not through RERA.