Browsing Tag

Property Dispute

9 posts
In a strong pro-senior citizen ruling, Bombay HC upheld cancellation of a Gift Deed and ordered a son to return his parents’ Lower Parel flat after he failed to provide lifelong care as promised.

Parents Gift Flat for Lifelong Care — Son Breaks Promise, Loses It in Court

In a strong pro-senior citizen ruling, Bombay HC upheld cancellation of a Gift Deed and ordered a son to return his parents’ Lower Parel flat after he failed to provide lifelong care as promised.
Bombay HC allowed homebuyers’ ₹45 lakh refund claim against Godrej to proceed despite a long filing delay.

Bombay HC Allows Homebuyers’ ₹45 Lakh Refund Claim Against Godrej to Proceed

The Bombay High Court has refused to interfere with orders condoning delay…
MahaRERA

Builder Drags Homebuyers to MahaRERA for Non-Payment, Gets Flats Cancelled & Money Forfeited

Pune developer Gera Developments dragged two homebuyers to MahaRERA for non-payment of installments. The authority cancelled both agreements but allowed the builder to forfeit only 2% instead of the demanded 10% plus charges.
“After paying ₹10,500 in 1977 and waiting decades, she never got the flat she had booked and was ready to pay for — but the court has finally ordered her money back with interest.”

Mumbai Building Saga: ₹12 Cr Deal Stands — Owner’s 13-Yr U-Turn Crushed by Bombay HC!

In a landmark interim ruling, Bombay HC protects Pankh Properties’ title to Matunga’s Adenwalla Building after 13 years, rejecting original owner Rusi Sorabji Khambatta’s sudden termination bid over a ₹12 crore 2012 deal. “Cannot unwind after pocketing the money,” court observes.
In a scathing reminder of bureaucratic lethargy, the Bombay High Court has held that Pune Municipal Corporation lost a reserved playground in Karvenagar to a housing society because it failed to acquire the land within the strict timeline mandated under Section 127 of the MRTP Act

Sold Land for ₹300 in 1962, Lost It Forever: Bombay HC Reminds Why Agreements Must Be Clear

A man who claimed his father sold land for ₹300 in 1962 under a loan-like arrangement has lost his bid to reclaim it. The Bombay High Court ruled the deal was a valid sale, highlighting the importance of clear and legally drafted property agreements.