Delay Excused: Developer’s Appeal Against MahaRERA to Proceed

In a significant ruling for homebuyers, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) has allowed a developer’s delayed appeal to proceed. The developer, Runwal Developers Pvt. Ltd., successfully argued that a long delay in challenging a MahaRERA order was due to their “bonafide” pursuit of a review application. While the court recognized the delay , it concluded there was no negligence or intentional prolonging of the matter. The appeal was allowed on the condition that the developer pays a cost of ₹10,000 to the homebuyers.

Possession Dates Are Not Up For Negotiation

In a landmark relief for homebuyers, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has stayed a MahaRERA order that overturned refund reliefs, ruling that review powers cannot amend substantive orders. This precedent strengthens homebuyer protections against promoter tactics.

Indiabulls Sky Forest Case: Landmark RERA Ruling Orders Developer to Issue Full Refunds with Interest

The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has issued a pivotal ruling in the Indiabulls Sky Forest case, directing the developer to provide homebuyers full refunds with interest, notably calculating interest on a significant portion from the original payment dates. This decision underscores RERA’s strength in safeguarding consumers against project delays.

Homebuyer Loses Flat, Payment Forfeited After Ignoring MahaRERA Order to Clear Dues

A recent MahaRERA order highlights the severe consequences for homebuyers who default on property payments and disregard regulatory directives. In a notable case, a homebuyer lost his flat and forfeited a significant amount already paid, serving as a critical warning for all property aspirants.

Homebuyers Win Big: Tribunal Nixes Builder Moratorium, Orders Compensation for Delays

In a landmark decision, the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has ordered developer Sheth Infraworld to compensate homebuyers for significant project delays, specifically disallowing the use of the pandemic-related moratorium as an excuse. This ruling marks a crucial victory for allottees seeking timely possession and fair compensation.