It is always said that any action if delayed then it costs the person who delays the action. A homebuyer recently suffered because he didn’t oppose the action of the builder on time.

By Varun Singh

This story is yet another reminder of why acting on time is necessary, a delay may end up hurting your own cause.

A homebuyer delayed his action and it ended up going against him at the end.

Homebuyer Ketan Kothari Trust approached MahaRERA against the developers Super Construction Company and Sangam Ananya Developers Pvt Ltd.

The Trust had booked an apartment admeasuring 710 square feet carpet area in the project Nero located in Bandra East.

The homebuyer approached for two reasons, firstly to register the agreement for sale and secondly for delayed possession.

It was found by MahaRERA that the builder had collected more than 10% of the consideration amount. Hence, the complainant is entitled to seek relief under section 13 of RERA (registration of agreement of sale).

The homebuyer had also sought relief under section 18 of RERA, which was seeking interest for delayed possession.

MahaRERA noted that the MOU signed by the developer number 1, it has agreed to handover possession of the flat to the homebuyer on or before MArch 31, 2017.

Thereafter by a letter dated December 19, 2018 the builder number 1 confirmed the said allotment and revised the date of possession of the flat to the homebuyer from March 31, 2017 to December 31, 2020.

Dr Vijay Satbir Singh, Member 1, MahaRERA in his order noted, “Complainant (homebuyer) till filing of his complaint on March 12, 2020 has not taken any action to oppose the revised date of possession. It should have taken appropriate steps at the relevant time even by approaching MahaRERA against the action on the part of builder number 1.”

Singh further stated, “The delay (in taking action) has not been explained by the complainant. Hence MahaRERA is of the view that the complainant has accepted the revised date of possession.”

The homebuyer was then allowed to seek relief under section 18 of RERA from January 1, 2021 till actual date of possession.

The builder was directed to pay interest to the homebuyer from January 1, 2021 for every month till the actual date of possession on the amount paid by the homebuyer at the prevailing rate of Marginal Cost of Lending Rate (MCLR) of SBI plus 2%.

Also Read: Parking Issue: Shift The Wall Orders MahaRERA

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Mumbai Developers Face 3 Months Imprisonment in Landmark RERA Case

The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has ordered the arrest and three-month imprisonment of Neptune Developers’ judgment debtors for failing to comply with attachment warrants and notices under RERA provisions. This landmark ruling highlights stricter enforcement to protect homebuyers and ensure developer accountability.

MahaRERA’s Rule on Housing Society Formation: A Guide for Homebuyers in Maharashtra

Under MahaRERA guidelines, developers must enable the formation of a housing society or legal entity within three months from when 51% of apartments are booked or upon receiving the Occupancy Certificate (OC). This provision, per Section 11(4)(e) of the RERA Act, empowers homebuyers by shifting control from promoters to residents.

Indian REITs Deliver 6-7% Yields, Outperforming Global Peers; Market Cap to Hit $25 Bn by 2030

Despite being a young market, Indian REITs are delivering competitive yields of 6-7%, outperforming many mature markets. A joint report by ANAROCK and CREDAI projects the sector’s market cap to grow from $18 billion to over $25 billion by 2030, driven by diversification into high-demand assets like logistics and data centres.

This is what Real Estate Industry thought about Budget

Nirmala Sitharaman the Union Finance Minister presented the budget on Tuesday. The…