A homebuyer was ordered by MahaRERA to pay interest to the developer for delay in payment. The builder claimed he had sent the buyer several demand letters.

By Varun Singh

Normally we hear that a builder is asked to pay interest for delayed possession to a buyer

Recently a homebuyer was ordered by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) to pay interest to a developer. This was for delay in payment by the buyer to the developer.

The developer SMP Namrata Associates had approached MahaRERA against a homebuyer.

The developer informed that via a registered agreement on August 29, 2019, he sold a flat to the homebuyer for Rs 50.34 lakh.

Flat sold was in the project Life 360 Phase 1, in Pune, for which the homebuyer had paid Rs 1 lakh to the developer.

Builder also alleged that he sent several demand letters between August to December 2019 seeking balance payment from homebuyer.

The homebuyer then in January 2020 sent a legal notice to the builder for non allotment of car parking space.

The developer stated to MahaRERA, that as he had faced a lot of hardship and on account of non payment from homebuyer the agreement should be cancelled. The developer also asked to forfeit the amount paid by the buyer.

Developer also informed MahaRERA that he was willing to go ahead with the agreement if the buyer was willing to make the payments along with interest.

On the other hand the allottee stated that she was ready to pay the amount as per agreement as her loan got sanctioned in December 2019.

She informed the authority that the developer hasn’t given her parking and also increased the GST amount from 5% to 7%. Hence she couldn’t pay the dues to the builder.

The buyer further stated that she is still ready and willing to pay the outstanding dues but the direction be issued to the complainant (builder) to waive off the interest amount raised by the builder.

MahaRERA member 1, Dr Vijay Satbir Singh opined that that the buyer being an allottee is liable to make payments in accordance with the terms and condition of the sale agreement.

Failing which the promoter is entitled to terminate the agreement for sale as per the provision of section 11 (5) of the RERA.

In this case, the buyer showed her willingness to make the payment. Hence, MahaRERA directed buyer to make necessary payment to the builder within a period of one month. Failing which the builder would be entitled to terminate the agreement for sale.

Further Singh in his order stated, “MahaRERA is of the view that in case of any default on the part of allottee or the promoter, either party would be entitled to seek interest for such a default as prescribed under section 18 of the RERA.”

“Accordingly, if the respondent (buyer) has made any default in timely payment as per the agreement for sale, she would be liable to pay interest for the delayed payment at the rate of Marginal Cost Lending Rate (MCLR) of SBI plus 2% as prescribed under RERA,” the order stated, disposing the complaint.

Also Read: MahaRERA Disposes 70% Of All Complaints Received

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Sentiments improve for real estate with Q1 2022

Sentiments improve for real estate with Q1 2022 Current and Future Sentiment…

Maharashtra Govt Issues Orders to Regularise Pre-2011 Residential Encroachments on Govt Land

In a relief measure for poor families, the Maharashtra government has decided to regularise purely residential encroachments on government land that existed before 1 January 2011. The policy offers free regularization up to 500 sq ft and charges only 10% of market value for additional area up to 1,500 sq ft, with a last date of 31 December 2026 for applications. Mumbai districts are excluded.

ED Tightens Noose on Anil Ambani Group: Assets Worth ₹1,120 Crore Attached, Total Seizures Cross ₹10,117 Crore

The ED has attached properties worth ₹1,120 crore belonging to the Reliance Anil Ambani Group in the Yes Bank–Reliance Finance fraud probe, pushing cumulative attachments to ₹10,117 crore. The assets include major Mumbai real estate, Chennai plots, Panvel flats, and large financial holdings tied to multiple group entities.

Stamp duty to remain unchanged for now

Stamp duty for the state of Maharashtra to remain unchanged for now.…