The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has rejected an appeal by Pune-based developer Nitin Navgire due to an inordinate delay of nearly two years in seeking restoration of two previously dismissed appeals.

Navgire had approached the Tribunal to condone a delay of 23 months and 20 days in filing for restoration of Appeals No. AT005000000053192 and AT005000000053193 of 2021. He claimed financial hardship, caused by being cheated by a former business partner, prevented him from complying with RERA requirements and attending hearings.

The Tribunal, however, found this explanation inadequate. It ruled that the delay was not backed by “sufficient cause,” especially since the developer failed to deposit the amount ordered by the Authority in its November 2021 directive — a prerequisite under Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 before an appeal can be entertained.

The appeals were originally dismissed in February 2022 after Navgire repeatedly failed to appear or comply. The Tribunal noted that the restoration applications were filed only after recovery warrants had been issued against him, raising concerns of deliberate delay tactics to stall the recovery process.

The non-applicants opposed the restoration, stating that condoning such a delay would unfairly impact them and encourage negligent behavior by litigants.

Citing key Supreme Court guidelines on delay condonation, the Tribunal stressed that financial difficulty alone cannot justify such prolonged inaction. All related applications, including those for stay and restoration, were disposed of, and the original appeals were deemed no longer maintainable.

Each party was instructed to bear its own legal costs.

Also Read: Builder cancels booking, MahaRERA orders refund

You May Also Like

Rebel ShivSena MLA Sandipan Bhumare Wins a Home in MHADA lottery

ShivSena MLA Sandipanrao Bhumare

After a Decade of Waiting, MahaRERA Orders Homebuyer to Settle Remaining Payment for Flat Booking

On October 17, 2024, MahaRERA issued a significant order in the case of Rajendra Bhabutmal Shah vs. Shatrughan Bhanudas Chavare, instructing the homebuyer to pay the outstanding balance for a flat booked nearly ten years ago. This decision emphasizes the need for adherence to contractual commitments in real estate dealings.

Realty Stocks Open Cautious as Markets Consolidate; Stock-Specific Moves Dominate Early Trade

Real estate stocks opened on a cautious note as Indian markets showed signs of consolidation. While select large developers saw mild gains, broader weakness in mid-caps points to a range-bound and stock-specific trading session ahead.

Vacant Flat Can Still Attract Income Tax Notice: Mumbai ITAT Remands Case on Notional Rent

Mumbai ITAT has remanded a case holding that a vacant flat not let out can still attract income tax under Section 23 of the IT Act.