The Developer Was Found Guilty By MahaRERA Of Unfair Trade Practices

By Varun Singh

Recently a developer was found guilty of indulging in unfair practices, he had mentioned a possession date in the draft agreement but then he changed the date in the original copy of agreement. Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) held the developer guilty of indulging in unfair practice within section 7 of RERA and he was asked to pay interest to the home buyers. 

Home buyers Kishor and Suhma Surve approached MahaRERA against the developer Mindspace Realty Pvt Ltd. The home buyers complained that the developer in whose project they had booked the flat in Chinchwad, had agreed to hand over the possession of the flat in December 2018. He had even sent them a draft of the agreement mentioning the same date. Thereafter, the developer took the signature of the home buyers and without showing them the date of possession mentioned there in. When they received the original copy of the agreement, they found that instead of December 2018, it was December 2020 that was mentioned. 

The home buyers informed MahaRERA that they wanted to continue in the project and hence claimed interest on their investment for delayed possession. 

The developers failed to appear despite repeated notice, and hence the complaint proceeded exparte against them. B D Kapadnis, Member, MahaRERA who was hearing the case, held that, the home buyers had filed an affidavit wherein they clearly mentioned that the developer had mentioned the date of possession as December 2018 in the draft agreement and however, in the agreement executed and registered the mentioned possession date was December 2020.

The home buyers even produced the copy of the draft agreement which showed the date of the possession as December 2018. “Therefore, I believe the complainants to hold that the respondents (developer) promised to hand over the possession of the flat by December 2018, but without informing them, the developer incorporated the date of possession as December 2020, int he agreement. This is decptive practice of the developer, hence, I find that the developer are guilty of indulging in unfair practice within section 7 of RERA,” noted Kapadnis in his order. 

He finally ordered, the developer to pay an interest at the rate of 10.4 per cent to the home buyers on their investment of Rs 42/69 lakh from January 2019, till delivering the physical possession of the flat with Occupation Certificate. The developer was also asked to pay Rs 10,000 to the home buyers towards cost of complaint. 

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Housing Sales Value to Cross INR 4.5 Lakh Cr in 2023, From INR 3.27 Lakh Cr in 2022

Homes worth INR 3.49 Lakh Cr. already sold across the top 7…

Indoor Amusement Centers in India to Expand by 67% by 2028

A new JLL report forecasts a 67% increase in India’s Indoor Amusement Center (IAC) space by 2028, expanding to 11 million square feet. The growth, driven by rising consumer demand and shifting retail trends, highlights the expanding role of IACs in transforming shopping malls into entertainment hubs. The report notes significant leasing activity in major cities and emerging markets, reflecting a broader trend towards immersive and diverse retail experiences.

MahaRERA Dismisses Homebuyers’ Refund Plea as They Relinquished Property to Lender

MahaRERA has ruled that homebuyers who relinquish their property to a lender lose their right to claim refunds from the developer. In a case involving the Zeal Regency project, two buyers sought a refund after the project was delayed, but MahaRERA dismissed their plea, citing that they had surrendered ownership to the lender, who later auctioned the flat.

At 4.45% Bengaluru’s Rental Yield Highest in Q1 2024, Mumbai Next with 4.15%

Bengaluru’s rental yield in pre-Covid 2019 stood at 3.6% – a 24%…