When a developer termed a complainant as investor, MahaRERA told the builder that the claims of the complainant cannot be denied merely by saying that they are investors and not allottees, since they have invested their money in the project.

By Varun Singh

In an interesting order MahaRERA told a developer that claims of a homebuyer cannot be denied, merely by saying that they are investors and ot allottees.

The reason for this, MahaRERA told the developer that since the complainants have invested their money in the MahaRERA project.

Kamal Agrawal and Babita Agrawal approached MahaRERA against Sakla Enterprises.

The complaints of the Agrawal family was that they wanted MahaRERA to direct the builder to execute the registered agreement for sale with them and hand over possession too.

The Agrawal family claimed that they booked five flats in Sagar Complex, Boisar, for total consideration of Rs 15 lakh for each flat.

The complainants claimed they have paid entire consideration and they were issued five separate allottement letters dated October 9, 2017 igned by the developer and was duly notarized.

As per the allotment letter the developer had agreed to handover the possession within a period of two years or else the developer had agreed to buy back the flats.

To support their claim the complainants even uploaded the allotment letter cum agreement signed y both the parties.

The developer resisted the claims of the complainant and stated that the complainants aren’t allottees but are investor.

The developer further stated the complainants approached the developer for investment purposes, for which the developer handed over blank allotment letters to them as a security.

The developer stated the content of the allotment letter show that the complainants are investor since they were earning returns by investing the amount.

MahaRERA, member Dr Vijay Satbir Singh, stated that provision section 13 of RERA provided that the promoter cannot accept more than 10% amount from the allottees without first registering the agreement for sale with the allottee.

Singh stated that, “The promoter should not have accepted the money from the complainants without first registering the agreements for sale with the complainants.”

MahaRERA told the developer it cannot deny the claims of the complainants meerely by saying that they are investor and not allottees since the complainants have invested their money in the registered project.

The developer was then directed by the developer to execute registered agreement for sale in accordance with the allotment letters cum agreements dated October 9, 2017, failing which the money paid by the complainant be refunded.

Also Read: Builder Knocks MahaRERA Door For Payments From Homebuyers

Leave a Reply
You May Also Like

Builder Fined by RERA for “Coming Soon” Ads

The Bihar RERA has fined a developer ₹1 lakh for displaying “Coming Soon” posters and online ads for an unregistered project, holding that even minimal promotions violate Section 3 of the RERA Act and defeat buyer protection goals.

🏏 Mumbai Cricket Association Seeks Land for Residential Women’s Academy After World Cup Glory

The Mumbai Cricket Association has formally requested land for a dedicated Residential Women’s Cricket Academy, citing the recent World Cup victory and the need to end logistical hardships like long commutes for female players. The MCA promises to build and operate the non-profit ‘centre of excellence’ to create a lasting legacy for women’s sports in Maharashtra.

RBI Cuts Repo Rate by 25bps: A Boon for Homebuyers and the Real Estate Sector

The RBI’s decision to cut the repo rate by 25 bps to 6.25% is a significant boost for the real estate sector. Experts believe this move, coupled with recent tax benefits, will make home loans more affordable, encourage homebuyers, and drive market growth. Industry leaders highlight the positive impact on liquidity, affordability, and overall demand in both residential and commercial real estate.

Payment Default by Homebuyers: MahaRERA Upholds Builder’s Right to Cancel Allotments

MahaRERA has ruled that homebuyers who repeatedly default on payments risk losing their flats, upholding a builder’s right to cancel allotments under Section 11(5) of the RERA Act.